Full record / 05._Property_Tax_Appeal_Answer_Form_Valuation_Poverty_Classification.0e8b55d5-d9b0-47bd-9aaf-391f66f3f910.pdf

05._Property_Tax_Appeal_Answer_Form_Valuation_Poverty_Classification.0e8b55d5-d9b0-47bd-9aaf-391f66f3f910.pdf

Michelle Denise Beverly, Petitioner V City Of Lathrup Village, Respondent · 25-003866-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

PROPERTY TAX APPEAL ANSWER FORM

VALUATION / EXEMPTION / CLASSIFICATION APPEAL

MOAHR DOCKET NO. 25-003866

Section 1: Respondent’s Contact Information

Filer Type: Local Unit of Government City Of Lathrup Village (OAKLAND)

First Name

M.I.

Last Name/Company Name/Unit of Government

Mailing Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

City or Town

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

Telephone Number

Fax Number

E-mail Address

Section 2: Respondent’s Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Contact Information

First Name

Justin

M.I.

Edward

Last Name

Prybylski

Firm Name (if any)

Address (No., Street, P.O. Box or Rural Route)

27400 Southfield Rd

City or Town

Lathrup Village

State

Michigan

ZIP Code

48076

Telephone Number

248-207-5504

Fax Number

E-mail Address

assessor@lathrupvillage.org

Section 3: Subject Property Information

Does the subject property have a Principal Residence Exemption of 50% or more? 

Yes

Are the parcels listed by Petitioner contiguous or adjoining? If not, list which parcels adjoin one another.

N/A 

Section 4: Explain Your Answer to this Appeal

Pursuant to Michigan Tax Tribunal Rule (TTR) 277(3), you MUST submit a copy of the notice giving rise to the appeal (e.g. Board of Review 

Decision, Notice of Uncapping, or Assessment Change Notice) with this Small Claims Answer, if applicable. If you do not submit this 

document, you may be held in default.

Page 2

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Petitioner's appeal is not valid. Respondent (City Assessor) granted the PRE for the current & three prior years in accordance with MCL 211.7cc. The Petitioner's 

property was not denied for prior years 2010-2021. The Principal Residence Exemption (PRE) was at 0% due to Petitioner not filing form 2368 timely after their 

purchase on October 5, 2010.

Respondent requests that Petitioner's Petition be dismissed with prejudice due to lack of jurisdiction.

Section 5: Jurisdictional Issues

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE TRUE CASH AND/OR TAXABLE VALUES

Did Petitioner protest the assessment at a Board of Review (BOR)? No

If yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 

If no, was the Notice of Assessment properly sent to Petitioner prior to the March BOR? *Submit a copy of the Notice of Assessment with the Answer.

If the July or December BOR revised the assessment(s) at issue, did it have authority? 

If yes, cite the Board’s authority.

Was the assessment(s) at issue established as the result of a clerical error or mutual mistake of fact? No

If yes, explain.

Is Petitioner appealing from a State Tax Commission Order? 

If so, what is the issue date?

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE UNCAPPING OF TAXABLE VALUE

When was the Notice of Uncapping, if applicable, issued?

Under what statutory section was the Taxable Value uncapped?

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF A POVERTY EXEMPTION

Did Petitioner request a Poverty Exemption at a BOR? 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended: 

List the date the BOR denied Petitioner’s Poverty Exemption:

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE DENIAL OF AN EXEMPTION 

OTHER THAN POVERTY, PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE, OR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN

GRETCHEN WHITMER

GOVERNOR

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS

LANSING

ORLENE HAWKS

DIRECTOR

Did Petitioner request the exemption at the BOR? 

If Yes, check which BOR Petitioner attended:

Tax Year(s) denied:

List the date the exemption was denied:

What statutory section did Petitioner request the subject property be exempt?

IF PETITIONER IS APPEALING THE CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY

What do you believe the classification should be: 

Section 6: Valuation Information *Use the multiple parcel form for additional, contiguous parcels.

Parcel Identification Number:

40-24-23-251-001

Classification of Property:

Real 

Residential

Current Assessed Value (also known as State Equalized Value) as established by the BOR:

169,630

Current Taxable Value as established by the BOR:

85,520

What do you believe is the fair market value (also known as True Cash Value)?

339,260

Multiply the True Cash Value by. 5 and enter here. This is your contention of Assessed Value.

169,630

If you believe the Taxable Value differs from your contention of Assessed Value, enter your contention of Taxable Value. 

85,520

Electronic Signature *Typing your name below will serve as your signature

Respondent or Attorney/Authorized Representative’s Signature: 

/s/ Justin E. Prybylski, MMAO(4), MCPPE

PDF reading copy

← View full record