26-000976.pdf
Felix Multi LLC/Alta Enterprises LLC Petitioner Vs. Township Of Blair Respondent · 26-000976-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
* H.WENDELL JOHNSON* RECEIVED SMITH SJOHNSON JUL 27 2026 ATTORNEYS PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL LOUIS A. SMITH - FOUNDER TIMOTHY P. SMITH FIVE HUNDRED THIRTY FOUR EAST FRONT STREET (1939-2024) KENNETH M. PETTERSON POST OFFICE BOX 705 L.PAGE GRAVES ’ ~ 4 Z ALLEN G. ANDERSON Ne SHO TWELL, TRAVERSE CITY, MICHIGAN 49685-0705 (1953-2019) BRADLEYD, WIERDA TELEPHONE: (231) 946-0700 4 ih FACSIMILE: (231) 946-1735 WEBSITE THEODORE M. LARKIN ith-. ERE A LANSING 517) 482-5142 ‘www.Smith-Johnson.com E-MAIL ADDRESS RETIRED SHAREHOLDER kdeback@smith-johnson.com July 23, 2026 Department of Licensing & Regulatory Affairs Michigan Tax Tribunal P.O. Box 30232 Lansing, MI 48909 Re: Felix Multi LLC v Blair Township Docket No. 26-976-TT Dear Clerk: Enclosed for filing please find Answer to Petition and Affirmative Defenses, 2026 Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation and Property Classification for Parcel 28-02-695-001- 00 and Proof of Service in the above matter. Thank you for your assistance in this regard. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at your convenience. Sincerely yours, SMITH & JOHNSON, ATTORNEYS, P.C. Klas = Keeley A. DeBack KAD:wmw Enclosure cc w/enc: Sarah Belloli
Page 2
STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL FELIX MULTI LLC/ALTA ENTERPRISES LLC., Petitioner, v BLAIR TOWNSHIP — GRAND TRAVERSE, Respondent. Docket No. 26-000976-TT Parcel No. 28-02-695-001-00 Bradley D. Wierda (P63811) Keeley DeBack (P89186) SMITH & JOHNSON, ATTORNEYS, P.C. Attorneys for Respondent 534 E. Front St. — PO Box 705 Traverse City, MI 49685 (231) 946-0700 kdeback(@smith-johnson.com bwierda@smith-johnson.com Sarah R. Belloli Ryan, LLC Representative for Petitioner 101 West Big Beaver Suite 945 Troy, MI 48084 (313)230-0104 Sarah.Belloli@Ryan.com Matthew.Dingman@Ryan.com Joan.Kleiner@Ryan.com ANSWER TO PETITION AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES NOW COMES Respondent, Blair Township, by and through its attorneys, Smith & Johnson, Attorneys, P.C., and for its Answer, states as follows: 1) Respondent admits the Property Parcel Number of the subject property is 28-02-695-001-00.
Page 3
4) Respondent admits that paragraph 4 is inapplicable because the Petition challenges only the assessment of real property and therefore no answer is required. 5) Respondent admits that paragraph 5 is inapplicable because the Petition does not involve personal property and therefore no answer is required. 6) Respondent admits that the Subject Property is classified as 201 Commercial-Improved. 7) Upon information and belief, Respondent admits that Petitioner did not protest to the Board of Review. 8) Respondent admits that paragraph 8 is inapplicable and therefore no answer is required. 9) Respondent admits that paragraph 9 is inapplicable and therefore no answer is required. 10) Respondent admits the address contained in Paragraph 10 of the Petition. 11) Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 11 of the Petition. 12) Respondent lacks sufficient information and knowledge necessary to respond to the truth of the allegations set forth in Paragraph 12 and, therefore, leaves Petitioner to its proofs. 13) Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 13 of the Petition. 14) Respondent admits the allegations in Paragraph 14 of the Petition. 15) Respondent admits that paragraph 15 is inapplicable and therefore no answer is required. 16) Respondent admits the allegations contained in Paragraph 16 of the Petition. 17) The Respondent denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 17 of the Petition because they are untrue.
Page 4
19) The Respondent denies that Petitioner is entitled to the relief requested in Paragraph 19 and demands strict proof thereof. 20) A. Respondent denies that the State Equalized Value exceeds fifty percent (50%) of the subject property’s True Cash Value or that the assessment violates any applicable statutory or constitutional limitation and demands strict proof thereof. B. Respondent denies that the assessment is based on improper or inaccurate valuation methodology, the use of non-representative data, failure to account for relevant property characteristics, application of incorrect assumptions, or that the assessment is not uniform with comparable properties or results in an excessive or unlawful tax burden and demands strict proof thereof. WHEREFORE, Respondent, Blair Township respectfully requests the Tribunal dismiss the Petition with prejudice, affirm Respondent's assessment and taxable value of the subject property, and award Respondent its costs and attorney fees. SMITH & JOHNSON, ATTORNEYS, P.C wa Bradley D. Wierda (P63811) Keeley A. DeBack (P89186) Attorneys for Respondent Dated: July 23, 2026
Page 5
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES NOW COMES Respondent, Blair Township, by and through its attorneys, Smith & Johnson, Attorneys, P.C., and asserts the following affirmative defenses: 1. Petitioner has failed to allege specific and sufficient facts to set forth a cause of action against Respondent and to support its claim for relief. 2. Petitioner has failed to allege specific or sufficient facts to establish fraud, error of law, discrimination, application of improper principles, or illegality on the part of the Respondent. 3. Petitioner has failed to allege how the mode and method of appraising its property failed to conform with the mode and method applied in the case of all of the properties in the Respondent's taxing unit for the year in question. 4. Itisthe Petitioner’s burden to establish the subject property’s true cash value. See MCL 205.737(3). 5. The Petitioner bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the assessment is incorrect. 6. Petitioner has failed to allege specific or sufficient facts to establish the true cash value, assessed value, and taxable value of it’s property.
Page 6
the true cash value of the subject property. 9. Petitioner fails to allege specific or sufficient facts to support its allegations that the property's taxable value is improper. 10. Petitioner's claims are barred because the valuation methods used by Respondent followed statutory and constitutional requirements. 11. Any decrease in value of Petitioner’s property was a result of its own intentional acts and/or negligence and cannot be allowed to reduce Petitioner’s otherwise equitable tax burden. 12. Respondent reserves the right to add additional affirmative defenses as they may become known during the course of these proceedings. Respectfully submitted, SMITH & JOHNSON, ATTORNEYS, P.C HK fOued— Dated: July 23, 2026 Bradley D. Wierda (P63811) Keeley A. DeBack (P89186) Attorneys for Respondent
Page 7
Michigan Department of Treasury, THIS IS NOT A TAX BILL L-4400 1019 (Rev. 10-25) Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification This form is issued under the authority of Public Act 206 of 1893, Sec. 211.24¢ and Sec.211.34c, as amended. This is a model assessment notice to be used by the local assessor. FROM PARCEL IDENTIFICATION BLAIR TOWNSHIP PARCEL NUMBER: 28-02-695-001-00 PE SaiNe rs RTMENT PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1061 STEPKE CT GRAWN, Mi 49637 TRAVERSE CITY, MI 49685 SCHOOL DISTRICT CODE: 28010 OWNER'S NAME AND ADDRESS/PERSON NAMED ON ASSESSMENT ROLL: EXEMPTIONS FELIX MULTI LLC % Exempt As "Homeowners Principal Residence" 0% WP CAREY INC, ONE MANHATTAN WEST % Exempt As "Quallfid Agricultural Property” 0% Fo on FLOOR % Exempt As "MBT Industrial Personal": 0% ' % Exempt As "MBT Commercial Personal"; 0% Exempt ~ roemed Veteran or CIYes [X] No Exempt As "Qualified Forest Property" [7] Yes No Exempt As "Development Property”: [dyes [X] No LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1 ALSO COM NE COR LOT 1 THN 43 TO C/L TH S 89 DEG 42' E 100' TH S 543' TH N 89 DEG 42' W 100' TH N 500' TO POB SEC 8 T26N R11W STEPKE SUBDIVISION PUBLIC UTILITY LINE EASEMENT - SEWER RECORDED 8-11-05 2005R-18108 ACCORDING TO MCL 211.34c THIS PROPERTY IS CLASSIFIED AS: 201 Commercial PRIOR YEAR'S CLASSIFICATION 201 Commercial PRIOR AMOUNT CURRENT TENTATIVE CHANGE FROM ; PRIOR YEAR TO YEAR: 2025 AMOUNT YEAR: 526 CURRENT YEAR 1. TAXABLE VALUE: 1,005,364 1,032,508 27,144 2. ASSESSED VALUE: 1186600] 1,153,500 3100] 3. TENTATIVE EQUALIZATION FACTOR: 1.000 4. STATE EQUALIZED VALUE (SEV): 1,156,600 1,153,500] -3,100 5. WAS THERE A TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP IN 2025 THAT RESULTED IN A TAXABLE VALUE UNCAPPING? [7] Yes No 6. Assessor Change Reason(s): Market Adjustment The 2026 Inflation rate Multiplier is: 1.027 Questions regarding the Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification may be directed to the Following: Name: Telephone Number: Email Address: WENDY L WITKOP (231) 276-9263 107 ASSESSOR@BLAIRTOWNSHIPMLGOV March Board of Review Appeal Information. The Board of Review will meet at the following dates and times: THE TAXABLE VALUE, THE ASSESSED VALUE, THE STATE EQUALIZED VALUE, THE PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION, OR THE
Page 8
STATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL FELIX MULTI LLC/ALTA ENTERPRISES LLC., Petitioner, v BLAIR TOWNSHIP — GRAND TRAVERSE, Respondent. Docket No. 26-000976-TT Parcel No. 28-02-695-001-00 Bradley D. Wierda (P63811) Keeley DeBack (P89186) SMITH & JOHNSON, ATTORNEYS, P.C. Attorneys for Respondent 534 E. Front St. — PO Box 705 Traverse City, MI 49685 (231) 946-0700 kdeback@smith-johnson.com bwierda@smith-johnson.com Sarah R. Belloli Ryan, LLC Representative for Petitioner 101 West Big Beaver Suite 945 Troy, MI 48084 (313)230-0104 (313)230-0104 Sarah.Belloli@Ryan.com Matthew.Dingman@Ryan.com Joan.Kleiner@Ryan.com PROOF OF SERVICE Wendy M. Webb says that on July 23, 2026, she did serve a copy of ANSWER TO PETITION AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES and 2026 NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT, TAXABLE VALUATION AND PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION for Parcel 28-02-695-001-00 by depositing the same in a United States mail receptacle, with first-class postage thereon fully prepaid, in Traverse City, Michigan, enclosed in a sealed envelope plainly addressed to the following at said address: Sarah R. Belloli Ryan, LLC 101 West Big Beaver, Suite 945 Troy, MI 48084
Page 9
SMITH & JOHNSON, ATTORNEYS i, GRAND RAPIDS MI rat: PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ” - POST OFFICE BOX 705 24 JUL 2026 PM 3 it US POSTAGE+mevsones WA) — fet gd eR 2p 00s §001.07° TRAVERSE CITY, MICHIGAN 49685-0705 9 T EARL 0008047235 JUL 23 2026 av 9207 1 nr Department of Licensing & Regulatory Affairs Michigan Tax Tribunal paARosy P.O. Box 30232 Lansing, MI 48909 slg Fillgipliidi