Full record / Response to Petition, Affirmative Defenses and POS – RAC Ryan (ID 113753).pdf

Response to Petition, Affirmative Defenses and POS – RAC Ryan (ID 113753).pdf

Rac Ryan LLC, Petitioner Vs. City Of Warren, Respondent · 25-002385-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

RAC RYAN LLC 

MTT Docket No. 25-002385 

Petitioner, 

Parcel ID No. 12-13-06-228-026 

V. 

CITY OF WARREN, 

Respondent. 

JORDAN JONNA 

AF JONNA DEVELOPMENT 

Representative for Petitioner 

4036 Telegraph Road, Suite 201 

Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48302 

(248) 593-6200 

MARY MICHAELS (P44601) 

LAURA SULLIVAN (P42021) 

CITY OF WARREN 

Attorneys for Respondent 

One City Square, Ste. 400 

Warren, MI 48093 

(586) 574-4671 

/ 

RESPONSE TO PETITION 

Respondent, City of Warren, 

by and through 

its attorneys, MARY MICHAELS, Acting 

City Attorney and LAURA SULLIVAN, Assistant City Attorney, in response to the Petition states 

as follows: 

1. 

Paragraph 

1 

is not contested. 

2. 

Paragraph 2 is not contested. 

3. 

Paragraph 3 is not contested. 

4, 

Paragraph 4 is not contested.

Page 2

7. 

Paragraph 7 is not contested. 

8. 

Paragraph 

8 

is not contested except that the True Cash Value on the Subject 

Property Tax Record is $1,610,986.00. 

9. 

In 

response 

to 

Paragraph 

9, 

Respondent 

lacks 

sufficient 

knowledge 

or 

information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations and therefore leaves Petitioner to its 

proofs. 

10. 

In 

response 

to 

Paragraph 

10, 

Respondent 

lacks 

sufficient 

knowledge 

or 

information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations and therefore leaves Petitioner to its 

proofs. 

11. 

In response to Paragraph 11, (a)-(d) is denied. 

THEREFORE, Respondent City of Warren requests this Tribunal deny the requested 

relief, dismiss the Petition with prejudice, and award Respondent costs it incurred in the defense 

of this appeal. 

Respectfully submitted, 

By: 

[s/Laura Sullivan 

LAURA SULLIVAN (P42021) 

Assistant City Attorney 

Attorneys for Respondent 

Dated: 

July 14, 2025 

LS/vIt Response to Petition, Affirmative Defenses and POS — RAC Ryan LLC ID 113654

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

RAC RYAN LLC 

MTT Docket No. 25-002385 

Petitioner, 

Parcel ID No. 12-13-06-228-026 

V. 

CITY OF WARREN, 

Respondent. 

JORDAN JONNA 

AF JONNA DEVELOPMENT 

Representative for Petitioner 

4036 Telegraph Road, Suite 201 

Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48302 

(248) 593-6200 

MARY MICHAELS (P44601) 

LAURA SULLIVAN (P42021) 

CITY OF WARREN 

Attorneys for Respondent 

One City Square, Ste. 400 

Warren, MI 48093 

(586) 574-4671 

/ 

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 

Respondent, 

City of Warren, 

by and through 

its attorneys, MARY MICHAELS, Acting 

City Attorney and LAURA SULLIVAN, Assistant City Attorney, 

in response 

to the Petition, 

submit the following Affirmative Defenses: 

1. 

Petitioner failed 

to allege specific and sufficient facts to set forth 

a cause 

of 

action. 

2. 

Petitioner failed to allege specific and sufficient facts to establish illegality on part 

of Respondent, or its agent.

Page 4

5. 

Petitioner failed to allege that the mode and method of assessing the subject 

property fails to conform to the mode and method applied in the case of all other properties in 

Respondent's taxing unit for the year in question. 

6. 

Petitioner failed to show that any factor other than fifty percent (50%) was applied 

to the true cash value of Petitioner's property, as well as all others, to arrive at the respective 

assessments appearing on the 

roll, and also failed 

to allege specific and sufficient facts to 

support its allegations that the property’s taxable value is improper. 

7. 

Petitioner failed to submit any evidence warranting relief from the assessments to 

the Board of Review. 

8. 

Petitioner, 

in essence, seeks by petition to challenge the process of county and 

state equalization as to which it has no legal standing and cannot maintain a cause of action. 

9. 

Respondent reserves 

the 

right 

to 

raise 

additional defenses 

as may become 

known to 

it during the course of these proceedings. 

Respectfully submitted, 

By: 

/s/Laura Sullivan 

LAURA SULLIVAN (P42021) 

Assistant City Attorney 

Attorneys for Respondent 

Dated: 

July 14, 2025 

LS/vIt Response to Petition, Affirmative Defenses and POS — RAC Ryan ID 113654

Page 5

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

RAC RYAN LLC 

MTT Docket No. 25-002385 

Petitioner, 

Parcel ID No. 12-13-06-228-026 

V. 

CITY OF WARREN, 

Respondent. 

JORDAN JONNA 

AF JONNA DEVELOPMENT 

Representative for Petitioner 

4036 Telegraph Road, Suite 201 

Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48302 

(248) 593-6200 

MARY MICHAELS (P44601) 

LAURA SULLIVAN (P42021) 

CITY OF WARREN 

Attorneys for Respondent 

One City Square, Ste. 400 

Warren, MI 48093 

(586) 574-4671 

/ 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

) 

) SS. 

COUNTY OF MACOMB 

) 

On the date below, 

| sent via email 

to fkuza@afjonna.com 

a copy 

of Respondent City of 

Warren's Response to Petition, Affirmative Defenses and Proof of Service. 

| declare that the statements above are true to the best of my information, knowledge, and 

belief. 

[s/Valerie Tack 

Valerie Tack 

Dated: 

July 14, 2025

PDF reading copy

← View full record