Full record / Jarbo Atif - West Bloomfield - ET Petition 2026.pdf

Jarbo Atif - West Bloomfield - ET Petition 2026.pdf

Atif Jarbo, Cynthia Jarbo Petitioners Vs. Township Of West Bloomfield Respondent · 26-000912-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

JARBO, ATIF AND CYNTHIA, 

 

Petitioner, 

v 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MTT Dkt. No. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WEST BLOOMFIELD TOWNSHIP, 

 

 

Parcel No. X 18 11 478 016 

Respondent. 

 

 

 

 

 

______________________________________/ 

 

 

 

 

PETER ELLENSON (P 47383) 

 

 

 

 

LAW OFFICE OF PETER ELLENSON, P.C. 

 

 

Attorney for Petitioner 

 

 

 

 

 

30500 Northwestern Highway, Suite 500 

Farmington Hills, MI 48334 

248 406 4443 

peter@ellensonlaw.com 

______________________________________/ 

 

ENTIRE TRIBUNAL TAX PETITION – TY 2026 

 

 

NOW COMES Petitioners, ATIF AND CYNTHIA JARBO, through their attorney, 

PETER ELLENSON, and state as follows in support of this Petition: 

1. 

Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to the property taxes for the following 

parcel number: X 18 11 478 016, located at 3193 Interlaken, West Bloomfield, MI 48323. 

 

2. 

Petitioner’s principal office address is 3193 Interlaken, West Bloomfield, MI 

48323. 

3. 

Respondent Township of West Bloomfield assesses and collects the ad valorem 

property taxes associated with the subject parcel. 

4. 

The subject property is classified as residential improved (401). 

5. 

The subject property is located in Oakland County. 

6. 

This appeal involves the property’s true cash and taxable values. 

7. 

The tax year at issue is 2026.

Page 2

8. 

Petitioner filed a March 2026 Board of Review protest. The decision notice is 

submitted separately. 

9. 

The 2026 values for the subject property as established by the Respondent at its 

March 2026 Board of Review are: 

True Cash Value 

 

Assessed Value 

 

Taxable Value 

 

6,731,220 

 

 

3,365,610 

 

 

3,112,388 

 

10. 

Petitioner contends that the values for the subject property are: 

True Cash Value 

 

Assessed Value 

 

Taxable Value 

 

5,000,000 

 

 

2,500,000 

 

 

2,500,000 

 

11. 

The values in dispute for the subject property are: 

True Cash Value 

 

Assessed Value 

 

Taxable Value 

 

1,731,220 

 

 

856,610 

 

 

612,388 

 

12. 

Petitioner requests that this Honorable Tribunal order the assessing entity to 

correct its tax rolls to reflect taxable, assessed and state equalized values as indicated above (or 

on the attached supplement) to issue refunds as appropriate, and to pay interest and costs. 

13. 

The basis for the requested relief is that the assessed and taxable values exceed 

50% of the true cash value of the subject property. 

 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Peter Ellenson 

_______________________________ 

 

Date: May 13, 2026 

PETER ELLENSON (P 47383) 

Attorney for Petitioner 

248 406 4443 

peter@ellensonlaw.com

PDF reading copy

← View full record