Full record / AA - 125.pdf

AA - 125.pdf

Realta Capital 125 S Main LLC & Hall Gratiot Partners LLC Petitioner Vs. City Of Ann Arbor Respondent · 26-000844-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

REALTA CAPITAL125S MAIN LIC & 

HALL GRATIOT PARTNERS LLC, 

Petitioner, 

Vv. 

MTT Docket # 26-000844 

CITY OF ANN ARBOR, 

Respondent. 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

) 

) ss. 

COUNTY OF OAKLAND) 

Aaron M. Fales, being duly sworn, deposes and says that on August % 

, 2026 he served a copy 

of Petitioner's Petition on the parties named on the attached list. 

Aaron M. Fales

Page 2

BY CERTIFIED UNITED STATES MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED: 

CLERK 

ANN ARBOR 

301 

EL TIURON STREET, P.O. BOX 8647 

ANN ARBOR, MI 48107-8647 

ASSESSOR 

ANN ARBOR 

301 

LE. IIURON STREET, P.O. BOX 8647 

ANN ARBOR, M1 48107-8647 

AND BY FIRST-CLASS UNITED STATES MAIL: 

CLERK 

WASHTENAW COUNTY 

PO BOX 8643 

ANN ARBOR, M] 48107-8645 

DIRECTOR OF EQUALIZATION 

WASHTENAW COUNTY 

PO BOX 8645 

ANN ARBOR, M1 48107-8645 

SECRETARY OF SCHOOL BOARD 

ANN ARBOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS 

2555 8. STATE STREET 

ANN ARBOR. ME 48104 

STATE TREASURER 

MICHIGAN DEPAR FMENT OF TREASURY 

TREASURY BUILDING 

430 W. ALLEGAN ST. 

LANSING. MI 48922

Page 3

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Realta Capital 125 S Main LLC & Hall Gratiot Partners LLC, 

Petitioner, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

v 

MTT Docket No.: 26-000844 

City Of Ann Arbor, 

Respondent. 

NOTICE OF DOCKET NUMBER 

TAKE NOTICE that an Entire Tribunal petition has been filed and the above-noted 

docket number has been assigned to that petition. This docket number shall be noted 

on the petition and the petition shall be served within 45 days of the issuance of 

this notice, as required by TTR 227 and MCL 205.7354, even if the petition was served 

when filed. A proof of service shall also be filed with the Tribunal within 45 days of the 

issuance of this notice evidencing the service of the petition. 

If you submitted a proof of service with the petition, you must still serve the petition and 

file a second proof of service including the docket number, pursuant to this notice. 

Failure to serve the petition and file a proof of service within 45 days of the issuance of 

the notice may result in the dismissal of this case. 

Under TTR 235(1), “[tlhe respondent shall file an answer or responsive motion within 28 

days after the date of service of the petition with noted docket number.” Failure to do so 

will result in Respondent being placed in default. 

The docket number also needs to be noted on all other documents submitted in this 

case. Further, the assignment of the docket number does not mean that the Tribunal 

has authority over the petition or that the petition complies with statutory requirements 

or the Tribunal’s rules. 

By: Tribunal Clerk 

Entered: June 23, 2026 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

| certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS SYSTEM 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

REALTA CAPITAL 125 S MAIN, LLC & HALL 

GRATIOT PARTNERS LLC, 

Petitioner, 

MTT Docket #24- 000844 

Parcel No. 09-09-29-132-024 

VS. 

CITY OF ANN ARBOR, 

Respondent. 

/ 

PETITION 

REALTA CAPITAL 

125 

S MAIN, 

LLC and 

HALL GRATIOT PARTNERS 

LLC 

("Petitioner"), through their attorneys, Law Office of Aaron M. Fales, P.C., says: 

1. 

Petitioner's principal office address 

is 330 Hamilton Row, Suite 300, 

Birmingham, MI 48009. 

Petitioner is a party in interest with respect to property 

taxes on real property tax parcel no. 09-09-29-132-024 ("Petitioner's Property"), at 

101 

E Washington St., Ann Arbor, ML, 

2. 

Respondent, City of Ann Arbor assesses and collects property taxes 

on Petitioner's Property. 

3. 

In 2026, Respondent determined the taxable value of Petitioner's 

Property 

to 

be 

$2,978,300 and 

assessed 

Petitioner's 

Property 

at $5,247,700 

resulfing in a state equalized value of the same amount based on the tenative

Page 5

4, 

Petitioner's 

Property 

is 

classified 

as 

Commercial 

Real 

Property. 

Petitioner's Property 

is commercial property. 

Petitioner believes that Petitioner's 

Property was designed to be used as a commercial purposes. 

5. 

This matter involves issues relating to: {a) valuation, (b) assessment, 

(c) taxable value, and {d) uniformity. 

6. 

Af this time, Petitioner believes, as 

if relates to taxable value, that 

there is a dispute relative fo the value of a loss. 

7. 

The 2026 assessment, including state equalized value and taxable 

value, 

imposed 

on 

Petitioner's 

Property, 

and 

the 

taxes 

to 

be 

levied 

and 

collected thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as a fraud upon the 

taxpayer for the reasons that: 

(a) 

The 

assessment, 

including 

state 

equalized 

value 

and/or 

taxable value, exceeds the amount permitted by the Michigan Constitution and 

applicable statutes; 

{b) 

The 

assessment, 

including 

stafe 

equalized 

value 

and/or 

taxable value, are at higher percentages of true cash value than permissible 

under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; 

(c) 

The 

assessment, 

including 

taxable 

value 

and/or 

state 

equalized value, are based upon an erroneous determination of the frue cash

Page 6

(d} 

The 

assessment, 

including 

state 

equalized 

value 

and/or 

taxable 

value, 

and 

the 

mode 

of 

assessment 

adopted 

by 

Respondent, 

discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner 

ifs constitutional 

rights 

to 

uniformity, equal protection and due process of law. 

WHEREFORE, 

Petitioner requests 

that 

the Tax Tribunal 

enter an 

Order 

reducing 

the 2026 taxable value 

of 

Petitioner's Property from $2,978,300 

to 

$1,000,000, and reducing 

the 2026 assessed and state equalized values 

of 

Petitioner's Property from $5,247,700 to $1,000,000 and requiring Respondent to 

pay Petitioner the refunds attributable to such reductions, plus interest and costs. 

Respectfully submitted, 

LAW OFFICE OF AARON M. FALES, P.C. 

Attorney for Petitioner 

oy Lo 

Aaron M. Fales (P72864) 

330 Hamilton Row, Ste. 350 

Birmingham, MI 48009 

(248) 767-9840 

Dated: May 11, 2026

PDF reading copy

← View full record