Full record / Response to Petition, Affirmative Defenses and POS – CSJ Holdings (ID 113301).pdf

Response to Petition, Affirmative Defenses and POS – CSJ Holdings (ID 113301).pdf

Cjs Holdings Of Warren, LLC, Petitioner Vs. City Of Warren, Respondent · 25-001814-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

CSJ HOLDINGS OF WARREN, LLC, 

 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-001814 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Parcel ID No. 12-13-35-352-014 

 

 

 

Petitioner, 

-v- 

 

CITY OF WARREN, 

 

Respondent. 

______________________________/ 

BARRY STEINWAY 

Representative for Petitioner 

5851 Cherrywood, Apt. 1901 

West Bloomfield, Michigan 48322 

(248) 563-2544 

basteinway@gmail.com 

innercitymarkets@yahoo.com 

 

WARREN CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE 

MARY MICHAELS (P44601) 

CANDICE M. MAYER (P85421) 

Attorneys for Respondent 

One City Square, Ste. 400 

Warren, Michigan 48093 

(586) 574-4671 

cmayer@cityofwarren.org 

______________________________________________________________________ 

 

RESPONSE TO PETITION 

 

 

Respondent, CITY OF WARREN, by its attorneys, MARY MICHAELS, Acting 

City Attorney, and CANDICE MAYER, Assistant City Attorney, in response to the 

Petition states as follows: 

1. 

Respondent admits ¶ 1. 

2. 

Respondent admits ¶ 2. 

3. 

Respondent states that ¶ 3 is not applicable to this Petition. 

4. 

Respondent states that ¶ 4 is not applicable to this Petition.

Page 2

5. 

Respondent states that ¶ 5 is not applicable to this Petition. 

6. 

Respondent admits ¶ 6. 

7. 

Respondent states that ¶ 7 is not applicable to this Petition. 

8. 

Respondent states that ¶ 8 is not applicable to this Petition. 

9. 

Respondent states that ¶ 9 is not applicable to this Petition. 

10. 

Respondent admits ¶ 10. 

11. 

Respondent admits ¶ 11. 

12. 

Respondent lacks sufficient knowledge or information sufficient to form a 

belief as to the truth of the allegation in ¶ 12 and therefore, leaves Petitioner 

to its proofs. 

13. 

Respondent lacks sufficient knowledge or information sufficient to form a 

belief as to the truth of the allegation in ¶ 13 and therefore, leaves Petitioner 

to its proofs. 

14. 

Respondent admits ¶ 14. 

15. 

Respondent states that ¶ 15 is not applicable to this Petition. 

16. 

Respondent denies ¶ 16 as this matter was not brought before the Board of 

Review. 

17. 

Respondent lacks sufficient knowledge or information sufficient to form a 

belief as to the truth of the allegation in ¶ 17 and therefore, leaves Petitioner 

to its proofs. 

18. 

Respondent lacks sufficient knowledge or information sufficient to form a 

belief as to the truth of the allegation in ¶ 18 and therefore, leaves Petitioner 

to its proofs.

Page 3

19. 

Respondent lacks sufficient knowledge or information sufficient to form a 

belief as to the truth of the allegation in ¶ 19 and therefore, leaves Petitioner 

to its proofs. 

20. 

Respondent lacks sufficient knowledge or information sufficient to form a 

belief as to the truth of the allegation in ¶ 20 and therefore, leaves Petitioner 

to its proofs. 

WHEREFORE, Respondent, CITY OF WARREN, requests the Tribunal deny the 

requested relief, dismiss the Petition with prejudice, and award Respondent costs 

incurred by having to defend against this matter. 

Respectfully submitted, 

 

 ____________________________ 

CANDICE M. MAYER (P85421) 

Assistant City Attorney 

Attorney for Respondent 

 

 

Dated: June 24, 2025 

 

ID 113284 

Candice M. Mayer

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

CSJ HOLDINGS OF WARREN, LLC, 

 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-001814 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Parcel ID No. 12-13-35-352-014 

 

 

 

Petitioner, 

-v- 

 

CITY OF WARREN, 

 

Respondent. 

______________________________/ 

BARRY STEINWAY 

Representative for Petitioner 

5851 Cherrywood, Apt. 1901 

West Bloomfield, Michigan 48322 

(248) 563-2544 

basteinway@gmail.com 

innercitymarkets@yahoo.com 

 

WARREN CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE 

MARY MICHAELS (P44601) 

CANDICE M. MAYER (P85421) 

Attorneys for Respondent 

One City Square, Ste. 400 

Warren, Michigan 48093 

(586) 574-4671 

cmayer@cityofwarren.org 

______________________________________________________________________ 

 

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 

 

Respondent, CITY OF WARREN, by its attorneys, MARY MICHAELS, Acting 

City Attorney, and CANDICE MAYER, Assistant City Attorney, submit the following 

Affirmative Defenses: 

 

1. 

Petitioner failed to state any facts that would warrant relief from the 

assessment. 

2. 

This Petition is barred by laches and principles of equity. 

3. 

Petitioner failed to petition the Board of Review for relief.

Page 5

4. 

Petitioner failed to allege specific and sufficient facts to establish fraud, error 

of law, discrimination, application of wrong principles, or illegality on the part 

of Respondent or its agents. 

5. 

Respondent reserves the right to challenge the Petition, should taxes not be 

timely paid. 

6. 

Petitioner failed to allege that the mode and method of assessing the subject 

property fails to conform to the mode and method applied in the case of all 

other properties in Respondent’s taxing unit for the year in question. 

7. 

Petitioner failed to plead facts and law establishing jurisdiction of the Tribunal. 

8. 

Petitioner failed to show that any factor other than fifty percent (50%) was 

applied to the true cash value of Petitioner’s property, as well as all others, to 

arrive at the respective assessments appearing on the roll and also failed to 

allege specific and sufficient facts to support its allegations that the 

property’s taxable value is improper. 

9. 

Petitioner, in essence, seeks by petition to challenge the process of county 

and state equalization to which it has no legal standing and cannot maintain 

as cause of action. 

10. 

Respondent reserves the right to raise additional defenses as may become 

known during the course of these proceedings. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Respectfully submitted, 

 

 ____________________________ 

CANDICE M. MAYER (P85421) 

Assistant City Attorney 

Attorney for Respondent 

Dated: June 24, 2025 

 

ID 113284 

Candice M. Mayer

Page 6

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

CSJ HOLDINGS OF WARREN, LLC, 

 

 

MTT Docket No. 25-001814 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Parcel ID No. 12-13-35-352-014 

 

 

 

Petitioner, 

-v- 

 

CITY OF WARREN, 

 

Respondent. 

______________________________/ 

BARRY STEINWAY 

Representative for Petitioner 

5851 Cherrywood, Apt. 1901 

West Bloomfield, Michigan 48322 

(248) 563-2544 

basteinway@gmail.com 

innercitymarkets@yahoo.com 

 

WARREN CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE 

MARY MICHAELS (P44601) 

CANDICE M. MAYER (P85421) 

Attorneys for Respondent 

One City Square, Ste. 400 

Warren, Michigan 48093 

(586) 574-4671 

cmayer@cityofwarren.org 

______________________________________________________________________ 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

) 

 

 

 

 

) ss. 

COUNTY OF MACOMB 

) 

 

On June 24, 2025, I sent via email a copy of Respondent, City of Warren’s, Response to 

Petition, Affirmative Defenses, and Proof of Service to Barry A. Steinway at 

basteinway@gmail.com and innercitymarkets@yahoo.com. 

 

I declare that the statements above are true to the best of my information, knowledge, 

and belief. 

 

 ____________________________ 

CANDICE M. MAYER (P85421) 

Assistant City Attorney 

Dated: June 24, 2025 

Candice M. Mayer

PDF reading copy

← View full record