Full record / Troy Crossing - Petition 2026.pdf

Troy Crossing - Petition 2026.pdf

Troy Crossing LLC Petitioner Vs. City Of Troy Respondent · 26-001313-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

1 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

 

 

Troy Crossing LLC, 

 

Petitioner, 

 

v 

 

City of Troy, 

 

Respondent. 

 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

 

Docket No. 26-____________ 

 

Parcel No.: 88-20-24-352-067, 

 

and additional parcels 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

 

PROPERTY TAX PETITION 

(Entire Tribunal, 2026 Tax Year) 

 

Petitioner, by and through its attorneys, Hallahan & Associates, P.C., contends: 

1. The property that is the subject of this appeal consists of these contiguous real property 

parcels: 

REAL PROPERTY - CONTIGUOUS 

Parcel Number 

Address 

Classification 

Use 

88-20-24-352-067 

2105 E. Big Beaver -2195 

201 Comm Imp 

Apartments 

88-20-24-352-068 

2125 E. Big Beaver -2177 

201 Comm Imp 

Apartment 

2. ☒ N/A. 

If the assessment at issue was protested, the protest was made to Respondent’s: 

☐ March, ☐ July, ☐ December Board of Review. 

3. Respondent, identified above, assesses and collects taxes on the subject property. 

4. The subject property is located in the County of Oakland and school district of Troy. 

5. Petitioner is a taxpayer/party-in-interest with respect to property taxes on the subject property. 

6. The Petitioner’s principal office/legal residence address is: 600 N. Old Woodward Ave., Suite 

100, Birmingham, MI 48009-3835. 

7. This appeal involves issues related to: 

☒ the subject property’s true cash and taxable values 

☐ the subject property’s taxable value only 

 

there is a dispute as to the value of an addition or loss: ☐ Yes ☐ No 

☐ uniformity of the subject property’s assessment 

☐ the subject property’s exemption from ad valorem taxation under MCL ______

Page 2

2 

8. The tax year at issue is 2026. 

9. The subject property is listed on the attachment, including, by parcel number: 

a. 

Respondent’s Board of Review established values, 

b. 

Petitioner’s value contentions, and 

c. 

Values in dispute. 

10. Petitioner relies upon the following to support the relief requested: 

The 2026 values imposed on Petitioner’s property, and the taxes to be levied and collected 

thereon, are invalid and unlawful and operate as fraud upon the taxpayer for the reasons that: 

a. 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values exceed the amounts permitted by the 

Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; 

b. 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values are at higher percentages of true cash 

value than permissible under the Michigan Constitution and applicable statutes; 

c. 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values are based upon an erroneous 

determination of the true cash value of that portion of Petitioner’s property that is taxable 

under Michigan law and are based upon the application of wrong principles; and 

d. 

The assessed, state equalized and/or taxable values, and the mode of assessment adopted 

by Respondent, discriminate against Petitioner and deny Petitioner its constitutional 

rights of uniformity, equal protection and due process of law. 

Petitioner requests that the Tribunal enter an order reducing the 2026 values from those established 

by Respondent’s Board of Review to those contended by Petitioner, and order refunds attributable 

to the reductions, with interest, as provided by the Tax Tribunal Act. 

 

HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 

 

 

/s/ Laura M. Hallahan 

 

Laura M. Hallahan (P42101) 

Attorney for Petitioner 

1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302-0179 

(248) 731-3089 

Dated: May 23, 2026 

lhallahan@hallahanlaw.com, (248) 731-3090 

 

Filing Fee: $625

Page 3

3 

ATTACHMENT TO PETITION 

(Subject Property) 

 

 

VALUES 

Respondent’s Board of Review -and- Petitioner’s Contention 

Parcel Number 

Respondent 

Petitioner 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

88-20-24-352-067 

16,850,260 

8,425,130 

8,318,700 13,000,000 

6,500,000 

6,500,000 

88-20-24-352-068 

4,177,880 

2,088,940 

2,017,380 

3,000,000 

1,500,000 

1,500,000 

Totals 

21,028,140 10,514,070 10,336,080 16,000,000 

8,000,000 

8,000,000 

 

 

VALUES IN DISPUTE 

Parcel Number 

TCV 

SEV 

TV 

88-20-24-352-067 

3,850,260 

1,925,130 

1,818,700 

88-20-24-352-068 

1,177,880 

588,940 

517,380 

Totals 

5,028,140 

2,514,070 

2,336,080

PDF reading copy

← View full record