Full record / Mac Twp Huntington 1939 Answer.pdf

Mac Twp Huntington 1939 Answer.pdf

The Huntington National Bank, Petitioner Vs. Township Of Macomb, Respondent · 25-001939-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

THE HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK, 

Petitioner, 

VS. 

MTT Docket No. 25-001939 

MACOMB TOWNSHIP, 

Respondent. 

MICHELLE M. SILVEY (P69494) 

TIMOTHY D. TOMLINSON (P48519) 

ALEX MORSE 

YORK, DOLAN & TOMLINSON, P.C. 

DuCharme, McMillen & Assoc. Inc. 

Attorneys for Respondent 

Representatives for Petitioner 

22600 Hall Rd., Ste. 205 

9229 Delegates Row, Suite 375 

Clinton Township, MI 

48036 

Indianapolis, IN 46240 

(586) 263-5050 

(317) 689-6467 — ofc 

ttomlinson@yorkdolanlaw.com 

(917) 488-7825 — mobile 

msilvey@dmainc.com 

amorse@dmainc.com 

RESPONDENT'S ANSWER TO PETITION 

(Entire Tribunal, 2025 Tax Year) 

NOW COMES the Respondent, Macomb Township, by and through its attorneys, York, 

Dolan & Tomlinson, P.C., and in answer to Petitioner's Petition, states as follows: 

1. 

Respondent admits paragraph 1. 

2. 

Respondent admits paragraph 2. 

3. 

Respondent admits paragraph 3. 

4. 

Respondent neither admits nor denies paragraph 4 being without sufficient 

information to form a reasonable belief thereto. 

1

Page 2

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

14. 

15. 

16. 

Respondent admits paragraph 5. 

Respondent admits paragraph 6. 

Respondent admits paragraph 7. 

Respondent admits paragraph 8. 

Respondent admits paragraph 9. 

Respondent neither admits nor denies paragraph 4 being without sufficient 

information to form a reasonable belief thereto. 

Respondent denies paragraph 11 because it is untrue, leaving Petitioner to its 

proofs. 

Respondent admits paragraph 12. 

Respondent admits paragraph 13. 

Defendant denies paragraph 14 because it is untrue, leaving Petitioner to its 

proofs. 

Defendant denies paragraph 15 because it is untrue, leaving Petitioner to its 

proofs. 

Defendant denies paragraph 16, including (a) thru (d), because it is untrue, 

leaving Petitioner to its proofs. 

WHEREFORE, Respondent respectfully requests that this Honorable Tribunal dismiss 

the Petition, affirm the values as determined by Respondent, and award costs and attorney fees

Page 3

wrongfully incurred in having to defend this matter. 

Respectfully submitted, 

YORK, DOLAN.& 

TQMLINSON, P.C. 

“IL 

TIMOTHY D. TOMLINSON (P48519) 

Attorneys for Respondent 

22600 Hall Road, Ste. 205 

Clinton Twp., MI 48036 

(586) 263-5050 

ttomlinson@yorkdolanlaw.com 

Dated: August 11, 2025 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

17 

tndersignod certifies that the foregoing instrument vies 

v 

II parties to the above cause to cach of he tomers 

lerein at thelr 

addresses 

disclosed 

cp 

tho 

pleadings on 

¥ —/L 

5 

Ey: {J Overnight Courier 

FAX 

[1 E mailed 

0 Hand Delivered 

.S. Mall 

8 E flod 

cr 

[J Certified Mall 

ChScanned 

Signature 

XL re 

raPwYSw 

1

PDF reading copy

← View full record