Casey.pdf
William D Casey, Petitioner V Township Of Harrison, Respondent · 24-003628-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
RECEIVED JUL 02 2024 Special Assessment Tax Tribunal Appeal Petition MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL Parcel Identification: No. 17-12-15-103-035 Type of Special Assessment: Archer & Lakeshore and Riverdale & Powers Canals Proposed Special Assessment District for Accumulated Sediment and Aquatic Weeds Removal Classification of Property: Residential property Property Address: 39084 E. Archer, Harrison Township. MI 48045 Taxing Authority: Harrison Township, MI. Reason for Appeal: Proposition is highly flawed. See attached explanation. Did you protest assessment at the hearing to confirm the special Assessment: Yes, several times, both in presence and in writing. See attached copies. If yes, then what date: Both on March 25, 2024, and on May 13, 2024 How many years will special assessment be levied? Either $4,2446.71 directly, or $961.68 for each of 5 years at 5% interest. Wii 7) 2 inl) [Coy Signature: g ole ory Umea 76 Sea
Page 2
ARCHER & LAKESHORE AND RIVERDALE & POWERS CANALS PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND AQUATIC WEEDS A PETITION TO REMOVE AN AVERAGE OF 2 TO 3-FEET OF ORGANIC SEDIMENT FROM LAKE CANALS THAT MEASURES 4,860 LINEAR FEET LONG OR 233,217 SQUARE FEET IN THE DISTRICT. TO THE CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF HARRISON BOARD OF TRUSTEES, MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN: We, the undersigned, being record owners of at least fifty-one percent (51%) of the total frontage on the canals in the special assessment district hereinafter described, respectfully petition your Honorable Board, pursuant to Act 188, Public Acts of Michigan 1954, as amended, to conduct canal improvements in the following described area of the Charter Township of Harrison, Macomb County, Michigan: Parcels 12-15-377-001 through 12-15-377-010, 12-15-377-015 through 12-15-377-032, 12-15-377- 034, 12-15-377-036 and 12-15-377-037, 12-15-378-001 through 12-15-378-016, 12-15-378-019 through 12-15-378-023, 12-15-378-026 through 12-15-378-037, 12-15-378-041 through 12-15-378- 045, 12-22-102-035, 12-22-103-001 through 12-22-103-003, 12-22-103-006 through 12-22-103-016, 12-22-103-019 through 12-22-103-021, 12-22-103-024 through 12-22-103-036, 12-22-126-001 through 12-22-126-003, 12-22-126-006 through 12-22-126-029, 12-22-126-031 and 12-22-126-032, 12-22-152-002, 12-22-152-005 through 12-22-152-007, 12-22-153-002 through 12-22-153-004, 12- 22-153-010 through 12-22-153-014, 12-22-176-005, 12-22-176-009 and 12-22-176-010 of the St. Clair Haven Subdivision, Harrison Township, Macomb County, Michigan, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plats, Macomb County Records. for the purpose of furnishing canal improvements to the above described area of the Charter Township of Harrison, Macomb County, Michigan, which is hereby declared and determined to be the special assessment district which shall be required to pay the cost of said improvement: Remove an average of 2 to 3-feet of organic sediment from lake canals that measures 4,860 linear feet long or 233,217 square feet which is 5.35 surface acres located at the above address. The removal of an average of a 2 to 3-feet of soft organic biomass from this canal will result in the removal of approximately 2,020 cubic yards of fully de- watered organic biomass. Lots that host sediment bags will not be charged for the cost of the work. Final assessed cost is based on actual construction and miszelianeous costs. Estimate of Cost - $611,534 or $4,246.71 per lot. cial assessment district of the land benefited and to be
Page 3
PS
y,
o
17a
/
/
i
of
Ih
1
ot
1
4)
(4
bit
5
cr
NH!
04
L
IF
vy
I
5H
3
th
"
1
]
Y
lets
i
y
yin
Jl
i
fall
\
oo
Ely)
9,
Ir
"
wi
3
i
Ig
HO)
§
ioe
-
wii;
13
AF
vt
i
a
N
5.4
oi
ul
i
i
Fd
Y
hs
<
I
&
av
W“
Wi
OY
i”
a
3
16)
1
" EY]
oe
i
i
3
HEN
3)
ih
or
M
ad
A
[7]
fi
©
yy
imi
i
{
(
FE
jay
01 Jal)
3g
ik
o
0
J]
n
iD
=
“4
ge
i)
il
3)
i
n
we
i
{}
fe
gi
14]
8
Ve
yy
WY
il
A
i
IH
281
ii
a
nPage 4
Summary of our objections to the Archer-Pardee-Lakeshore Canal Dredging Proposal as devised. In short, this proposal has been highly flawed from the outset. First perhaps a bit of history. This canal system, along with nearby others, was dug about 90 years ago and has been dredged since over time. This one is a little over a half mile long, 50 feet wide, and varies in depth from about 8 feet to 4 feet, depending on location. Overall there are 144 lots on these canals. About half of the canal residents have boats behind their houses, some owned by residents, and others as paid dockage by non- residents. Boats sizes range in size from canoes up to now perhaps 38 footers, but it hasn't always been that way. Until a few years ago bridges surrounding the canal limited the size of boats that could access these canals due to height restrictions, however about 5 years ago the Archer Ave. bridge was removed then allowing larger boats to access the canal from Lake St. Clair. And it is now principally owners of these larger new-comer boats that claim on occasion to have bottoming problems. Parenthetically, until recently for 20 years | had a mid-size 25 foot Sea Ray cruiser that | docked behind my house on this canal and neverhad a bottoming problem —which | did have occasionally out in the lake however but those were easily remedied by temporarity just by lifting the outdrive for a white. So now this initiative is primarily aggressively driven by these few “Sunday sailors” that are largely enabled by inside contacts of Harrison Township officials. And as proposed, this is a very costly operation to all property owners on the canal: overall in excess of more than half a million dollars, at $539,339, and individually at $4,247/ single lot owner, and $8,494 / double lot owner, to be paid as a special tax assessment either directly, or over a five-year period at 5% interest. And clearly both substantively and procedurally this initiative is deeply flawed. First, as proposed, it is highly questionable as to whether a proposal such as this should be included under standard State of Michigan Special Assessment District procedures. Generally such instruments are reserved for measures that directly
Page 5
flimsy input only from those actively promoting the project or otherwise stand to financially benefit from it. Nowadays, with present technology trained hydrologists could easily map the depths and bottom conditions of this canal system within a few days, specifically indicating locations and specifics of problem areas if they exist, and then perhaps, if judged significantly bothersome to boaters, those could be specifically addressed (i.e., as “spot-dredging,” etc.), at a fraction of the overall cost of this proposal. Thirdly, as this proposal has evolved procedurally, it too is significantly flawed, with many petition signatures illegally included (duplicate signatures, non-residents’, etc.) - and when those are excluded that reduces valid proponents of this dredging proposal to only about 35-40%, far less than those claimed (55%) by proponents. Also, along the way, the proposal was first approved by the Harrison Township Board of Trustees to include dredging for all 144 adjacent lots, but when some of those owners complained that it was unnecessary for them, 16 of them were removed from the proposal leaving 128 to be accessed. (However, even by that, their arithmetic is either flawed, or someone is getting a free ride, since $539,338.53 divided by 128 does not equal $4,246.71, but rather that only accounts for 127.) We too, and others made the same complaint, but were ignored. All of these concerns have repeatedly been brought to Harrison Board ‘s attention, however largely disregarded as they seem to remain well under the influence of the few proponents aggressively driving these measures. In summary however, we should point out that we are not completely averse to some dredging efforts on this canal, but simply not as currently proposed. Otherwise, we will allow proponents to do it at their own expense. See attached copies of objections presented to township trustees over the course of consideration of this proposal.
Page 6
Objection to Archer Canal Dredging Proposal as it is devised As currently proposed, it seems as if this is a rather poorly conceived plan and likely an invitation for considerable disappointment not only for Archer Canal residents but perhaps for Harrison Township as well, with potential legal implications. Reasons why NOT to support dredging of the Archer Canal as currently proposed First, it is obviously a very expensive plan at $611,534, or the better part of two-thirds of a million dollars, and frankly not well thought out. Secondly, and perhaps worse, as proposed it will likely only directly benefit relatively few Archer Canal residents, all while being largely financed by the rest. So how is that? | have lived on this Archer canal for more than 20 years now, and over that period of time have had several boats docked behind my house. The last one was a 25 ft. SeaRay cruiser that | had for several years, including those when Lake St. Clair levels were low, and over that time span | never experienced a bottom issue while in the Archer Canal. Occasionally | did experience them out in the lake however, but the remedy was simple; just raise the outdrives some and the boat would again freely float away. And last time that | checked the center depth of the Archer Canal behind my house was something like 4% ~5 feet, and other than perhaps some deep-keeled sailboats, most motorized pleasure crafts less than 40 feet in fength draw much less than that. And this past year | did see perhaps a 36 foot motorized craft on the canal showing no apparent signs of bottoming difficulties. So then, what is the problem? The situation seems to be that in some spots (perhaps near the sides of the canal), some boaters, perhaps relatively few, bottom out on occasion. But from observation my guess would be that this situation only adversely affects relatively few of the Archer Canal boating residents, perhaps less than 10 to 15 %. So then, as proposed, do we really wish to have 90% of the unaffected boaters on the Archer Canal financially support the whims and needs of the other 10%, who can readily remedy their situation otherwise, just by temporarily raising their outdrives? And thirdly, one has to ask how much careful analysis has already gone into this situation? Have systematic bathymetric measurements been made by a responsible third party (and not just by boaters or vendors advocating such services)? With today’s technology these canal depth measurements, side to side, can be easily taken and readily mapped, and I think that that would be a good place to start to define where bothersome issues might exist. To use a somewhat parallel analogy, “No sense repaving the entire parking lot, to remedy occasional potholes.” Likewise, no need to dredge the entire Archer Canal system, rather than just addressing specific problems thal might exist — an approach that could easily lower the overall cost of the operation literally by hundreds of thousands of dollars. rding this proposal as it stands, is that as is, itis not at all well
Page 7
Rn Eh pid A } y RELA TIN He § FUR i 1h wtp \ it pao] Cry lla B Ent 2d! four 1itic) 1 3) i " “| i * ll i 1 ¢ TER \ LET ARTe ) Pose A0E vba vied Yar list pos § novo: sell of
Page 8
NOTICE OF HEARING ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENT BY CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF HARRISON BOARD OF TRUSTEES TO THE OWNERS OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: Parcels 12-15-377-001 through 12-15-377-010, 12-15-377-015 through 12-15-377-032, 12-15-377-034, 12-15-377-036 and 12-15-377-037, 12-15-378-001 through 12-15-378-016, 12-15-378-019 through 12-15- 378-023, 12-15-378-026 through 12-15-378-037, 12-15-378-041 through 12-15-378-045, 12-22-103-001 through 12-22-103-003, 12-22-103-006 through 12-22-103-016, 12-22-103-019 through 12-22-103-021, 12-22-103-024 through 12-22-103-036, 12-22-126-001 through 12-22-126-003, 12-22-126-006 through 12-22-126-029, 12-22-126-031 and 12-22-126-032 of the St. Clair Haven Subdivision, Harrison Township, Macomb County, Michigan, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plats, Macomb County Records. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a Special Assessment roll has been prepared and is on file in the Office of the Township Clerk for public examination during normal business hours. Said Special Assessment roll has been prepared for the purpose of assessing the cost of the following described improvement to the property benefited therefrom: The proposed project consists of removing an average of 2 to 3-feet of organic sediment from lake canals that measures 4,860 linear feet long or 233,217 square feet which is 5.35 surface acres located at the above address. The removal of an average of 2 to 3-feet of soft organic biomass from this canal will result in the removal of approximately 2,020 cubic yards of fully de-watered organic biomass. Lots that host sediment bags will not be charged for the cost of the work. Final assessed cost is based on actual construction and miscellaneous costs. Estimated total project cost to residents is $539,338.52 or the cost per lot $4,246.71 per lot (128) and annual estimated payment $961.68. TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Township Board shall meet on Monday, May 13, 2024 at 7:00 p.m., at the Rosso Memorial Hall, 38255 L'Anse Creuse, in the Charter Township of Harrison for the Assessment Roll and hearing any objections thereto.
Page 9
'
i
Fu
EY
A
v\
I
A
fey
43
[8
\
41
REA
RR
REL WE RE
I
VT)
He
013
{FBO
i
FANE
-
»
PUNY
.
3
{
4
{).Y
§.c
}
r
i
i
i
roofs
21
#1-T)
O
(eho
C5.
{
foses
a
5h
Jari
y
DHT
oC
PEI
nr
BN
LS
Coes
ey
IS
SCE
depo
eE0-En Loe
Coe
Ved
.
)
PYRE
ACH
2a VEL
5
HE!
DELI
beng
oi
til
vet
shit
LEE
i
NUL
Y TUEPage 10
Further Objection to Archer Canal Dredging Proposal as it is devised Unless significant refinements of this original proposal have been made, | with many other Archer-Pardee Canal residents remain staunchly opposed to this canal dredging operation as otherwise proposed, both for technical reasons and ethical reasons. To repeat a portion of my last letter distributed at the last Harrison Twp Bd of Trustees Meeting Reasons why NOT to support dredging of the Archer Canal as currently proposed First, it is obviously a very expensive plan at $611,534, or the better part of two-thirds of a million dollars, and frankly seems not well thought out. Secondly, and perhaps worse, as proposed it will likely only directly benefit relatively few Archer Canal residents, all while being largely financed by the rest. And as previously noted, | and many others on this canal have never experienced problems that this proposal attempts to address and as it is, it is remarkable vague. Let's just begin with just a few additional concerns to the initial proposal: the indeterminate extent of the canal remediation procedure. First, the extent of the proposed operation is/was remarkably obscure, as some “Archer” canal residents have already drawn this to your attention. The so-called “Archer Canal” referred to here actually consists of several segments. At its north end, the canal “begins” if you will, as a coalescence of three canals, the Venetian Canal, the West Archer Canal and the East Archer Canal, that are confluent and pass under a low South River Road bridge, to the Clinton River. id Vibser HERE The East Archer Canal segment then passes east \ Q under another low bridge which connects both River Bend Marina 5 River A East and West Archer roads to South River Rd., — a waterway passable only by canoes or rowboats -- and then extends south for about 0.7 mile to end at a “T,” one branch going east a few hundred oh yards under a Lakeshore bridge, and then into AIA Campau Bay of Lake St. Clair, with the other ES branch going west a few hundred yards before : coalescing again with the Venetian Canal, then heading south again a few hundred yards to empty into the Black Creek Basin, beside St. Clair Metro Park, before it too empties into Lake St. Clair via the Black Creek. (See map highlights at left) Swensens ing Services ance A Kling Electrical And to make matters more confusing,
Page 11
Further Objection to Archer Canal Dredging Proposal as it is devised Unless significant refinements of this original proposal have been made, | with many other Archer-Pardee Canal residents remain staunchly opposed to this canal dredging operation as otherwise proposed, both for technical reasons and ethical reasons. To repeat a portion of my last letter distributed at the last Harrison Twp Bd of Trustees Meeting Reasons why NOT to support dredging of the Archer Canal as currently proposed First, it is obviously a very expensive plan at $611,534, or the better part of two-thirds of a million dollars, and frankly seems not well thought out. Secondly, and perhaps worse, as proposed it will likely only directly benefit relatively few Archer Canal residents, all while being largely financed by the rest. And as previously noted, | and many others on this canal have never experienced problems that this proposal attempts to address and as it is, itis remarkable vague. : Let's just begin with just a few additional concerns fo the initial proposal: the indeterminate extent of the canal remediation procedure. First, the extent of the proposed operation is/was remarkably obscure, as some “Archer” canal residents have already drawn this to your attention. The so-called “Archer Canal’ referred to here actually consists of several segments. At its north end, the canal “begins” if you will, as a coalescence of three canals, the Venetian Canal, the West Archer Canal and the East Archer Canal, that are confluent and pass under a low South River Road bridge, to the Clinton River. The East Archer Canal segment then passes east under another low bridge which connects both East and West Archer roads to South River Rd., — a waterway passable only by canoes or rowboats — and then extends south for about 0.7 mile to end at a “T,” one branch going east a few hundred yards under a Lakeshore bridge, and then into Campau Bay of Lake St. Clair, with the other branch going west a few hundred yards before coalescing again with the Venetian Canal, then heading south again a few hundred yards to empty into the Black Creek Basin, beside St. Clair Metro Park, before it too empties into Lake St. Clair via the Back Creek. (See map highlights at left) And to make matters more confusing, the names several streets adjacent to these canals
Page 12
— Vi WW a ) /) 1/1 -
Page 13
No extractable text is available for this page; view the PDF below.
Page 14
‘ores 689) a > i 1 dost i His mr ‘pur Bunios PusTIOI auspIsay QUO pur Ages OA: ~7 pads opdoad oma 9oafoE om anoqe Aiqe ~JoAyun J(eads sjdosd sor mes pom (Ty's a Mode Ploy sea Buueay ongnd vo po pied su mun aed yor om 0 woniod ® Buuded oq nod pue fg x 193U1M 0A 01 310 0 [IM ester Mok uo sd 35219901 AUT IOUT 0) SARY JOM Nok 05 inj ur jo soslord ay fd oi fiimsoddo UE nod a8) + srusprsor oy re 03 snout UE 300 plios Jp. qUuiny [eu sys 198 om SU, Pres 3 Wepy is digsumor. 301 JO 3503 51) puod SM yreusour puny o3 Liq -edes ano pon. yaford sip osmebeg, ‘puodser oy 1 pay 195ford sus 10) spUGY Moge shaurone ay ou a1 S3paip ©) JMS Aus “Ssasse reads on 40 sioddns ur ssoyy Kejop avs Gunso strung ream “0 01 338 ss Buprar UODRS 2: Hus Surprar rR - 3 om ue passed SuoIsAMI Soupuipo yy to ue soupied $req Uo qos. psSpatp om Huiutewsar 3503 Sunpdue suod Teg) ae py +9805 51) 03 384 fed om (pur) oford or. um jsunon 5d 0 pojqn Supqssooid ogy Ps sons: Fujoutmols Somsp 1 Trea pus op enn ious orolqe aq fpem pr Lovin patio Jou sat sds. | Tey 3dURUIpIO a byjewt 535] 007, ‘pres ] og '2oUUIPIO Ue SUIEIONA 101 Si] pres Loy pur 204 9m MI pareotse sonssi fio sorBniur Z peng SEO ay Aus a3 eas] EI9pay put aes © 16 POU SAM 6nenoq ‘Sieoq. unl ssaippe 03 Soueuplo. 13g Mo BUSAN bq [IM BM SUD GIL, PIES ISDA vay osasdng drys UOT 9v0q uous Aiended su sseappe 01 Anomyoddo siios sear se avy Wan om ee : soins drgsumo) sy Jos suoNSEPIPT, “1809 351019p © Bupjosut uoneniss v yo wonnjoshi sy idwiord 01 repro uy suopbriyur Knadoyd yun| -uv] poiepdn os sep © Kauss Supuodss oy pure uossad oue Suny Ape Pepordes Iapddns dogs sours diysu, Joy sOUPIPIO A1oA05os ll eu o3 mop rs s31epdn a oquy _U1o7 sem suswssosse Tepads Sunms-Guoy © £8 Gunoour samsnig go preog disusor uosn | rer £1 A=] 9 pousp Juspuess pu ow “SO — JIHSNMOL NOSRNVE Woy ShatEpusBeIHen oo VITVANVIO AR > Teues [eas ‘sorepdn wi pio 90MPOIUT $IISNIT YO TE AYW + TYNENGT / 44 SO21ATS found Gorse 2 "oo “iq arg 258 170 drgsumon mo i oq seupio 0 845 oH 1 spon 10 Bopp a0 Aue “pp ead wg drysuised uy § (1 1908, yi 10) 008 30 PIOK 071 3 punose jo sseyoind ous parordde sodenn 40] 5 Palos passond | Premio -yuen : vem 01 suo pec'11 T avs saa3en Au 93 “naan pap | oinsip usa psy Hok JUSWTIUSS SEs oy) | boson 01x 1631 300 PIP BM, -A1a43 Bupsar om sy » Ie “onqnd : JY ‘vonrwIoNuL Popul pry op, dso aq ae sspidums pur opp oy A one Sui S31 $399138 S19MO] © _-PTULI panour 30 pre UOM s | pee soAoUI a | yEoT ie NNW nor
Page 15
= = < -/ i A 7s 4 py V4
Page 16
"ARCHER CANAL" PROPERTY OWNERS AND PETITION SIGNATURE INFORMATION ARCHER/PARDEE LOTS & ADDRESSES (North to South) ARCHER/PARDEE/ (North to South) Total| Signed | Page | Date | Add'l | Archer [Signed Not | Valid | Possibly [Valid Parcel Number Address Resident Lots Date | Pardee | Total Signed Signat| Total Parcel Number Address Total 1| |17-12-15-377-001 Lot - E Archer Dr Rapp, Kevin 1 X 4 | 10-06] 1 2| |17-12-15-377-002 _ |39488 E Archer Dr Mulder, Kenneth 2 X 9 [10-11 2 Ss 1 3| |17-12-15-377-003 39482 E Archer Dr Marsack, Kenneth &J 3 1 4| |17-12-15-377-004 |Lot-E Archer Dr Marsack, Kenneth &)J a 2 5| |17-12-15-377-005 39468 E Archer Dr Majed, Dania & Khaled 5 3 | 6| |17-12-15-377-006 _ |39456 E Archer Dr Clemens, Christopher 6 X 22 |-30-24) 3 S 2024 2 7| |17-12-15-377-007 _ |39450 E Archer Dr Van Luven, Charles 7 X 11 | 1017] 4 S 3 8| [17-12-15-377-008 39442 E Archer Dr Salo, Jeff 8 X 10 [10-21 5 Ss 4 9| [17-12-15-377-009 [39438 E Archer Dr Tances, Roxanne 9 X 2 11115 6 mn 10| [17-12-15-377-010 39432 E Archer Dr Neidelman, Michael & Shelia 10 4 11] [17-12-15-377-032 39426 E Archer Dr Winkler, Mark W 1 5 12| [17-12-15-377-036 |Lot- E Archer Dr Winkler, Mark W 12 6 13| |17-12-15-377-037 39406 E Archer Dr Milio, Ronald & Kristin 13 7 14| [17-12-15-377-034 39400 E Archer Dr Papsdorf, John F 14 X 13 [11-12 7 Ss 5 15| [17-12-15-377-015 [39380 E Arhcer Dr Stieber, Richard & Jeanne 15 X 11 | 10-17] 8 Ss 6 16| [17-12-15-377-016 [39364 E Archer Dr Drellick, Peter & Sue 16 X 1 No date 9 Ss 7 17| |17-12-15-377-017 _ |39352 E Archer Dr Rumohr, David W & Leslie-Dale 17 X 4 | 10-21|No Residence 10 18| |17-12-15-377-018 39340 E Archer Dr Ellsion, George 18 X 9 [10-11 11 Ss 8 19| [17-12-15-377-019 Lot - E Archer Dr Eellsion, George & Heather 19 X 9 [10-11] 11-12 | Twice? | 12 ? No address | 20) |17-12-15-377-020 _ |39316 E Archer Dr Beckett, Gene A & Susan A 20 8 21] [17-12-15-377-021 39300 E Archer Dr 'Smigiel, John G Trst 21 X 6 | 10-23|Not Owner? 13 22| [17-12-15-377-022 39282 E Archer Dr Boutin, Derek 22 9 23| [17-12-15-377-023 39280 E Archer Dr Bozimowski, Karen 23 10 24| [17-12-16-377-024 [39270 E Archer Dr Rentschler, Jeffrey 24 X 11 No date 14 Ss 9 25| |17-12-16-377-025 39260 E Archer Dr Swift, Christopher & Stephanie Trst| 25 X 3 [1016 15 Ss 10 26] [17-12-15-377-026 39240 E Archer Dr Gayhart, Eugene& Nichol 26 X 3 | 10-19] 16 Ss 11 27| [17-12-15-377-027 39220 E Archer Dr Unger, William & Jacqueline J 27 X 5 [10-22 17 ) 12 28| |17-12-15-377-028 39206 E Archer Dr Harder, Cathleen M 28 X 3 [10-20 18 S 13 29| [17-12-15-377-029 39184 E Archer Dr McMonigle, Michael & Mary 29 X 3 [10-20 19 Ss 14 30| [17-12-15-377-030 [39170 E Archer Dr Smith, Matthew L 30 1n 31| [17-12-15-377-031 39154 E Archer Dr Robinson, Matthew 31 X 5 [1022 20 Ss 15 32| |17-12-15-103-001 Lot - E Archer Dr Rumohr, David W & Leslie-Dale (Va| 32 X 4 | 10-21|No residence 21 Counted 3times ? 33] [17-12-15-103-002 |39116 E Archer Dr Rumohr, David W & Leslie-Dale 33 X 4 |1021 | 22 Ss 16 17-12-15-126-024 39101 E Archet Dr Kovack, Mark & Bogurmila X 6 | 10-24|No residence No residence 34| |17-12-15-103-003 39100 E Archer Dr Fekin, David 34 X 4 |10-21 23 Ss 17 35 [17-12-15-103-035 39084 E Archer Dr Casey, William D & Hapanowicz Pa| 35 12 36| [17-12-15-103-006 [39056 E Archer Dr Baker, Richard A 36 X 5 [10-23 24 S 18 37| [17-12-15-103-007 |Lot- E Archer Dr Ehlert, Elmer N (Vacant lot) 37 X 4 | 10-21|No residence 25 38| [17-12-15-103-008 Lot - E Archer Dr Walleman, Linda R 38 X 6 | 10-23|Didn't sign 26 39| |17-12-15-103-009 |39014 E Archer Dr Walleman, Linda R 39 X 6 | 10-23| Didn't sign 27 40| |17-12-15-103-010 38994 E Archer Dr Almacher, Cheryl 40 X 13 No date 28 S$? || Signature? 41] [17-12-15-103-011 38986 E Archer Dr Rizzo, Gaetano S 41 X 5 [10-21 29 Ss ? 19 42| [17-12-15-103-012 38978 E Archer Dr Croft, Glenn A & Miechelle P 42 13 Duplicant Sig. 43| [17-12-15-103-013 38970 E Archer Dr Morris, David R 43 X 18 11-6 30 Ss 20 | 44| |17-12-15-103-014 38960 E Archer Dr Guarnieri, Susan R a4 14 45| |17-12-16-103-015 |38950 E Archer Dr Busselman, Alan L 45 15 46| [17-12-15-103-016 38946 E Archer Dr Kenbeek, James & Doris 46 16 47| |17-12-15-103-036 |38922 E Archer Dr Woodward, Adam J Trst 47 17 48| [17-12-15-103-019 38906 Pardee St Robinson, Danny & Carmen 48 18 49| [17-12-15-103-020 |Lot - Pardee St Ede Richard & Hill Charmaine M 49 19 50| |17-12-15-103-021 38886 Pardee St Kovacik, Cindy L 50 20 51) [17-12-15-103-034 |38874 Pardee St Burns, William D 51 21
Page 17
I
1
|
LAKESHORE LOTS & ADDRESSES (North to South)
Lakeshord Signed
Valid
Valid
Total
Signat|
Total
63]
1|
[17-12-15-378-001
39641 Lakeshore Dr
|Andrion, Alexander J
62
X
1
104
1
36
Ss
No date
-
64
2|
[17-12-15-378-002
39631 Lakeshore Dr
|Harrell,
Joey & Karen
63
X
11
[10-21
2
37
Ss
27
65
3|
[17-12-15-378-003
39621 Lakeshore Dr
|Jackson, Todd & Starlita
64
X
12
[11-13
3
38
S
28
66|
4|
|17-12-15-378-004
39611 Lakeshore Dr
_|Diamond, Nicholas
& Michelle
65
X
1
[10-21
4
39
s
29
67|
5|
[17-12-16-378-005
39601 Lakeshore Dr
|Dritsas, Elizabeth Ann
66
X
9
[10-11
5
40
|llegible
Ss
Owner?
-
68|
6)
[17-12-15-378-006
39591 Lakeshore Dr
|Kopytek, Marcia
67
27
69
7|
|17-12-15-378-007
39581 Lakeshore Dr
|Trudell, Jesse
68
28
70|
8|
[17-12-15-378-008
39577 Lakeshore Dr
|Przywara, Mitchell
& Beata
69
29
71]
9|
[17-12-15-378-009
39565 Lakeshore Dr
|Pietke, Gerard & Ginger
70
30
72|
10|
[17-12-15-378-010
|39533 Lakeshore Dr
_|Dowker, Peter A
7
31
Ekd
30
73|
11]
|17-12-15-378-011
39517 Lakeshore Dr
_|Glatz, Marcel
72
32
74|
12|
[17-12-15-378-012
39501 Lakeshore Dr
(Deleon, Margo
73
X
0,22
(01-30-24
6
M“
Dup
75|
13|
[17-12-15-378-013
39475 Lakeshore Dr
[Polan, Mary-Anne
74
X
1
[1021
7
42
S
31
76|
14|
[17-12-15-378-014
39457 Lakeshore Dr
|Jolly, Pamela & Jeffrey M
75
33
77|
15]
|17-12-15-378-0156
39441 Lakeshore Dr
| Curtis, Thomas F
76
34
78|
16|
|17-12-15-378-016
39431 Lakeshore Dr
Frankenstein, Nicholas P
77
X
18
[10-18
8
43
S || Signature?
79]
17|
|17-12-15-378-045
39411 Lakeshore Dr
_|Shea, Robert
J
& Jacqueline
78
35
80|
18|
[17-12-15-378-019
39401 Lakeshore Dr
|Shea, Robert
J & Jacqueline
79
36
81|
19|
|17-12-15-378-020
39387 Lakeshore Dr
|Kay, Andrew
& Andra L
80
X
1
[10-21
9
44
S
32
82|
20|
[17-12-15-378-021
39375 Lakeshore Dr
|Kennedy, Georgene
F & Robert K
81
X
1
[10-21
10
45
Ss
33
83|
21|
[17-12-15-378-022
39363 Lakeshore Dr
|Varnas, Gary
82
|
37
8a]
22|
|17-12-15-378-023
|39351 Lakeshore Dr
_|Carson, Matthew
83
X
7
|119
n
46
s
34
85|
23|
[17-12-15-378-043
39339 Lakeshore Dr
(Amoroso, Michael
& Kathleen
84
38
86]
24)
|17-12-15-378-044
|39321 Lakeshore Dr
__|Graustein, Keith & Andrea
85
X
12
[11-13 |
Twice
12
47
Twice
Ss
87|
25|
[17-12-15-378-026
39303 Lakeshore Dr
|Lentini, Jacob
86
X
18
[11-25
2]
13
48
Sign. Prob |
§? |
Twice?
88|
26]
[17-12-15-378-027
39283 Lakeshore Dr
[Basile, Nino V
87
X
6
[10-28
14
49
s
35
89|
27|
[17-12-15-378-028
39267 Lakeshore Dr
|Lipinski, Rebecca
88
39
90|
28|
|17-12-15-378-029
39245 Lakeshore Dr
|Allar, Donald R
89
40
91|
29|
[17-12-15-378-030
39207 Lakeshore Dr
|Prybula, Zenon
20
a
92|
30|
[17-12-15-378-031
39191 Lakeshore Dr
|Anglin,
Wendy A & Momamy, Michael]
91
X
3
[116
15
50
? | [No date
93|
31|
|17-12-15-378-032
39173 Lakeshore Dr
|Johnson, Kristyn
92
42
94|
32|
[17-12-15-378-033
39155 Lakeshore Dr
|Runstadler, Keith & Craig
93
43
95|
33]
|17-12-15-378-034
39135 Lakeshore Dr
|Kasper, Marlene M Trust
94
X
18
11-19
16
51
S? | |Owner?
96|
34|
[17-12-15-378-035
39125 Lakeshore Dr
|Steyaert, Terrence J
95
44
97|
35]
[17-12-15-378-036
39115 Lakeshore Dr __
Flatt, Billy
W & Zappitell, Molly
9%
45
98|
36|
[17-12-15-378-037
39105 Lakeshore Dr
|Pilette, Russell
97
X
18
[11-25
17
52
$? | [Slgnature?
99|
37|
[17-12-15-378-041
39095 Lakeshore Dr
|Atleski, Vojo
& Susan
98
46
100|
38|
[17-12-15-378-042
39085 Lakeshore Dr
_|Palazzoni, David
29
a7
101|
39|
|17-12-15-126-001
39071 Lakeshore Dr
|Lakeshore Drive Property LLC
100
48
102|
40]
[17-12-15-126-002
39055 Lakeshore Dr | Pelkey, Michael R
101
X
9
[10-11
18
53
s
s
36
103|
41]
[17-12-16-126-003
{39041 Lakeshore Dr
_|Ashbrook, Thomas
102
49
104]
42|
[17-12-15-126-031
39015 Lakeshore Dr
|Lewis, Nadia & McCarthy Joshua
103
50
105|
43|
|17-12-15-126-006
39005 Lakeshore Dr
|Jozwiak, Danlel
& Griffith, Kathleen
104
X
1&9
[10-21 |
10-11
19
54 | Twice
S
Dup
106]
44|
|17-12-15-126-007
38995 Lakeshore Dr
|Bamhard, Michael
105
X
9
[10-11
20
55
S
Illegible
107|
45|
|17-12-15-126-008
|38985 Lakeshore Dr
_|Hines, Michael
106
X
9
[10-11
21
56
Ss
Ss
a7
108]
46|
[17-12-15-126-009
38979 Lakeshore Dr
(Wilhelm, Steven & Robin D
107
X
16
[10-26
22
57 | Twice
4
109|
47|
[17-12-15-126-010
|38971 Lakeshore Dr _|Ratza, James &Linda
108
X
15
[11-15 |
11-15
23
58 | Twice
6
Twice
110{
48]
|17-12-15-126-011
38963 Lakeshore Dr _ |Mertz, Cart W
109
X
7
[10-20
24
59
Ss
38
111]
49]
[17-12-15-126-012
38955 Lakeshore Dr
| Duffy, John P & Jeanne M
110
X
10-27
25
60
s
39
112|
50|
[17-12-15-126-013
38947 Lakeshore Dr
| Bartlett, Thomas & Bonnie Sue
111
51
113]
51]
|17-12-15-126-014
Lot - Lakeshore Dr
Mullica, Scott
& Carrie
12
52
114
52|
[17-12-15-126-015
|38921 Lakeshore Dr
_|Fournier, Thomas & Jennifer
113
X
7
[10-29
26
61
s
40
115|
53|
|17-12-15-126-016
38909 Lakeshore Dr
|Lightfoot, Benjamin
114
53
116|
54|
[17-12-15-126-017
38895 Lakeshore Dr
|Elsey, Mark
115
X
16
[11-7
27
62
s
41
117|
55|
[17-12-15-126-018
38883 Lakeshore Dr
|Duhaime,
Andrew W & Susan A
116
X
19
[11-25
28
63 | Twice
id
Twice
118|
56]
[17-12-15-126-019
38871 Lakeshore Dr
{Krolczyk, Shawn
& Cynthia
17
54
119)
57|
[17-12-15-126-020
38861 Lakeshore Dr
|Waller, Keith G & Kim A Trust
118
X
8
[11-13
29
64
?
Owner?
120
68]
|17-12-15-126-021
38853 Lakeshore Dr _
|Bolf, Michael
119
X
14
[10-22
30
65
Ss
42
121|
59|
|17-12-15-126-022
38845 Lakeshore Dr
|Lackey, RyanV
120
55
122|
60|
[17-12-15-126-023
38839 Lakeshore Dr
|Losicki, Robi & Michelle
121
X
14
[10-22
31
66 | Twice
8
s
3
123|
61]
|17-12-15-126-024
Lot - Lakeshore Dr
Kovach, Mark R
& Bogumila
122
X
6
[10-24
32
67
jtresidentPage 18
POND RESTORATION
Salesperson
Job #
Payment Terms
Russ Tackett
16565A | Due on completion
H
dg U 0 TE
Date: August 4, 2023
To:
Ken Mulder, President
39488 E. Archer Dr.
Harrison Twp, Mi 48045
586-405-7341
Scope of Work: This is an updated proposal based on our site visit and canal evaluation on 7-10-2023.
1. Sediment Removal System is fo remove an average of 2 to 3-Tee! of organic sediment from lake canals that measures 4,860 linear
feet long or 233,217 square feet which is 5.35 surface acres located at the above address. The removal of an average of a 2 to 3-feet
of soft organic biomass from this canal will result in the removal of approximately 2,020 cubic yards of fully de-watered organic
biomass.
2. We estimate needing 59 sediment removal days to remove an average of 2 to 3-feet of organic biomass from the canal plus
project set up
& tear down and tube roll out days. This creates a infal project length
of 85 days.
3. We will open discharge the water and organic sediment into 12 separate sediment containment tubes placed throughout the canal
length on the properties within 1,000 feet of the canal and removal areas. it may be necessary to utilize a secondary pump to push
the sediment farther than 750-feet especially i the organic sediment has sand mixed with &. Once the tube locations are-ehesen,
|
can arrange to meet with a confractor who can then submit a price for the tube prep, sediment haul away and tube site remediation.
This preliminary proposal does not include any needed permits and assumes that the sediment is non-hazardous.
Additional Information: FOR EFFICIENCY PURPOSES A LARGER THAN STANDARD PUMP WILL BE UTILIZED. THIS
PROJECT CAN BE PERFORMED IN SEGMENTS OVER TBAE IF DESIRED. FOR THIS PROJECT WE WILL FLOAT THE PUMP
DOWN THE CANAL. THIS PROPOSAL DOES NOT INCLUDE FEES OF ANY PERMITS FEES OR ANY OTHER COSTS
ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT THAT ARE UNKNOWN AT THE TIME AS OF THIS PROPOSAL DATE, OR INCREASE IN
TURE PRICING OR FUFL PRICE INCREASES AT THE TIBAE THE PROJECT START DATE.
Qty.
Description
Unit Price
Line Total
{59
| Sediment Removal Days
h
i
$3500
©
$206,500
TTT
20s Staycation Project Discount
)
:
CT
os11800
a
| Mobiization fee
TT
FC TU
s1200
1
| Feefora larger than standard pump
TT
;
$86,500
4
| Barge fee fo float 1 the
> pump throughout the canal
; TT TT $4,500
10
| 60ft x 100ft sediment containment tubes
:
34600 |
$46000
|
"8
| Project set-upltear down and tube set up days
-
$2,250
|
$13,500
[1
| Performance bond
TT
Tr
$8,400
|
|
1
| FeeWosecondpumpiinesded
TT
$6,500
|
Ll TESREsE
ee
ee estan |Page 19
nh ers Se etan She STEN ALA MA PISIATE I EH IARARS MITE EEL GEER ILE LILHHITIS WE UID UT TL ERBMS AND DEFINITIONS Site visit & Dive Evaluation: An evaluation of the project site, body of water & discharge site prior to the hard project quote. The evaluation will consist of a diver(s) entering the body of water and measuring sediment depth and density. The evaluation will also discover whether the sediments can be reached or if there are barriers, such as tree branches or other debris that would not allow removal of the sediment by our method. A site visit and dive evaluation for this project will cost $2,850. Dive Day: One dive day will consist of four hours of pump run time, water and weather conditions permitting, with two divers working simultaneously, creating one sediment removal dive day. The removal area is focused on the bottom of a body of water not the perimeter unless specified elsewhere in the scope of work. Discharge Site Information: The discharge site is the area in which all matter removed from the project's body of water, as described in the scope of work, will be disposed of or temporally stored. All discharge sites, whether open or contained, must conform to all local, state, and federal laws and regulations and permitting. Runoff from the discharge site on to adjacent properties or streams is not permitted. Open versus Contained Site: An open discharge site is one in which the sediment is discharged into an open, level, and fiat or depressed/bowled area. If there is no open discharge site available, then the sediment must be contained in a sediment containment tube or another type of contained area. We strive to accommodate any open discharge options as the containment tubes are expensive to use and require meticulous site preparation and, if desired, site restoration. Containment tubes typically require three to four months to de- water before contents are ready to be removed or used. Site preparation: A customer responsibility. Open discharge sites must be large enough to hold all discharge from the project site without encroachment on adjacent property. Contained discharge sites using a sediment containment tube(s) must be laser level and prepared with a minimum of 8 inches of wood chips to “cradle” the tube and to accelerate the dewatering process. *Site restoration: A customer responsibility. Site restoration is restoration of the discharge sight back to the original condition before the project star}, Because we offer our service throughout the Midwest, we have found it to be much more economical for the client to use a local |aNOSCapng or excavation contractor that you may be acquainted with in your immediate area for this service. Sediment Removal System Tiiay be available 1o assist or make available site preparation and restoration at additional cost. Suspended Sediment: SUSHENaed organic sediment/biomass is often referred Io as "muck". Excessive suspended sediment is an abundance of organic particulates consisting of decaying leaves, grass, animal droppings, algae, dying pond weeds, ete. that destroys favorable bacteria that aide the natural decomposition of organic matter. Excessive sediment promotes creation of toxic gases and a armful environment resulting in undesired smells and can lead to a fish kill. Suspended sediment does not include tree branches or other debris that would not allow removal of the sediment by our method. De-Watered Sediment: De-watered solids are sediments and soils left after they have been removed from the body of water and most of the water has drained out or dried up. CONTRACT CONDITIONS Sediment Removal System 1. This quotation is valid for 60 days and is subject to change after that time pericd. 2. Paid deposit guarantees placement on our calendar and not specific dates for the project to be performed. Unforeseen circumstances may necessitate the adjustment of proposed project dates. Unforeseen circumstances may include weather, travel, equipment, or project site situations. We will provide the best estimated project dates through continued communication with our customers. 3. This quotation is our estimate of labor, equipment and material required as of the date of this proposal however 22% project increase will apply if fuel prices réach or exceed $5.00 or higher per Gallon-at the time the project is performed. Actual project execution may vary in cost due to site requirements undiscovered at the time of the project's start. Additional labor, equipment, or material will be charged at negotiated rates or based upon direct equipment or material invoices. ) 4. Payment teins; 50% deposit with balance due upon completion of out work unfess other arrangements have been made in. advance. 5. Permits (focal, state, federal) are not included in any quotes. This customer is responsible for applying for and obtaining all permits unless noted in the Scope of Work however Sediment Removal System can help in obtaining permits if requested at an additional cost. 6. Known or perceived hazards to Sediment Removal System personnet or the project completion must be fully disclosed before the pre- dive evaluation or the project start, including but not exclusive to, animal inhabitation, traps, toxins or pollutants, geographic or manmade features such as underground utilities. Hazards discovered or not disclosed after project start may result in any deposit forfeiture. 7. We do not take the responsibility for the discharge site preparation, discharge site restoration, or removal and/or spreading of sediment as previously described above unless otherwise stated in the Scope of Work. The typical suggestion is to leave the organic sediment on the property as it is very nutrient rich and serves as a productive organic fertilizer. 8. Customer agrees fo receive shipment of the sediment containment tube(s) when used. 9. Customer agrees to provide reasonable security to all equipment present at worksite during term of contract. 10. Once atthe project site, any project delays not attributable to SRS will fesult in-an additional daily charge of $2,450 (not including weather). The daily rate will be charged even if afull sediment removal dive day:is not worked unless otherwise stated. 11. When the client declines a site visit and sediment evaluation, he or she can request a preliminary proposal be created based on the information provided by the client through our proposal questionnaire. if a client does contract with Sediment Removal System based on the preliminary proposal alone and the site conditions or sediment depths are not within the scope of work agreed to in the preliminary system used by Sediment Removal System, the
Page 20
DIENT BE! IL SISTENT" POND RESTORATID Thank YOU for allowing Sediment Removal System to propose our restoration services. We have successfully restored ponds, streams and channels by our unique hydraulically removal system since 2009. Our charges are based on a daily rate to save our client's money, as well as work within their budgets. If elected, our method allows projects to be completed in stages, over several years if necessary, and still achieve the same benefits. Our system does not harm aquatic life or the surrounding landscape. Coreg Operations Our core business is pond restoration by the hydraulic removal of excess and harmful suspended bottom organic sediments that cause environmental damage to your pond thus restoring its natural biological balance. We are a diver focused hydraulic sediment removal service. We displace the soft organic sediment and submersed aquatic weeds into a discharge area that may be on open land or into a sediment containment tube. The sediment containment tubes ars large geo-textile woven fabric tubes that capture the sediment inside while allowing the filtered water to escape. If sediment containment tubes are manufactured in many different lengths and circumferences and if they are required for your project, more information pertaining to the tubes and their requirements can be found on our website at www. sedimentremovalsystem.com in the “process Info’ tab and under the Terms and Definitions section of this document. Sediment Removal System is fully insured, and insurance certificates will be provided upon request, as well as references that you may contact. Depending on your stated goal of the restoration, we recommend starting the removal in the deepest area of the body of water first to maximize the greatest results. However, we understand that the customer may have an envisioned goal for the project and we are prepared to help the customer achieve their geal in any way we can. Please see the following preliminary proposal and scope of work for the specifics concerning your request. Please review it and all definitions, terms and conditions also included. For more information about us and our service, visit our website at www.sedimentremovalsystem.com. Thank you again for considering Sediment Removal System for your aquatic restoration project. If you have any questions or concerns, please call me at any time and 1 will help in any way I can. Regards, Russ Tackett, owner/operator Sediment Removal System Toll free 1-844-682-5636 Cell 313.300.3011. srsrusst@gmail.com
Page 21
Estimated Costs sediment Removal $ 281,300.00 Ricks Outdoor Services $ 151,900.00 Reimbursement for lots hosting sediment bags $ 39,710.00 Engineering $ 64,980.00 Contingency $ 43,320.00 Bond & Admin $ 30,324.00 Total $ 611,534.00 Cost per Lot $ 4,246.76 Estimated annual payment @ 5% interest S$ 961.68 Actual rate determined at time of bond sale
Page 22
RICK'S OUTDOOR SERVICES, LLC.
4233 N. Gregory Rd.
Fowlerville, Mi. 48836
517-223-2300
ESTIMATE
Muck Men
Estimate
Date
9064
8/18/2023
Pricing Valid For
Description
Qty
Cost
Total
IMPORT approx 1100 cubic yards of woodchips to build pads for Sediment
containment tubes
Labor & Machinery to build 11 pads for containment tubes including any silt
fencing and trenching necessary to route water to storm drains
EXPORT approx 1100 cubic yards of woodchips.
Approx 24 gravel train
loads
Disposal of Debris
EXPORT approx. 2020 cubic yards of sediment from containment tubes.
Approx 45 gravel train loads
Disposal of Debris
Labor & Machinery to load out materials into trucks. Approx 9 days
Labor & Materials for Restoration of areas where containment tubes were
placed. Harley Rake areas, grass seed and straw areas. Follow up in 2
weeks for seed and fertilizer application.
1100|
15.00 16500.00
11 [2800.0030800.00
24 500.00{12000.00
1100,
5.0015,500.00
45} 500.00 [22500.00
20200
5.00{10100.00
9 3000.0027000.00
11 2500.0027500.00Page 23
H130488E
#230432E
#330030F
#430014E
#530886
#636762
#738777
#832101
#330010
WATER RESOURCES DIVISION POLICY &
AcherDr
ArcherDr
ArcherDr
AwcherDr
PerdeaSt
Pardee St
Lakeshore Or
Riverdale St
Powers Dr
PROCEDURE - WRD-048 - Table 2
Sudge
Sludge
Sludge
Sludge
Sludge
Sludge
Sludge
Sludge
Sludge
CAS Number | Aqualic Life & Wildlife Screening Guidelines
Arsenic
mg/kg
8.14
422
7.92
9.73
746
542
1.68
3.02
8.2]
[Arsenic
fi
7440382]
33.00
Cadmium
mg/kg
0.88
0.5
1.18
1.53
1.24
06
0.21
0.82|
{Cadmium
7440439
4.98
Chromium
tagrkg
2486
13.1
28.3
38
277
16
5.26
8.42
22.8|
|Chromium (li)
16065831)
111.00
Copper
mg/kg
52.6
31
59.3
74.3
538
30.7
4.56
21.1
42.4]
{Copper
7440508]
149.00
Lead
mg/kg
325
16.6
34.9
48
333
177
13.1
6.31
26.8]
{Lead
7438921]
128.00
Mercury
mg/kg
0.06
0.137
0186
0.114
0.103
0.092]
Mercury (Total)
Varies
1.08
Nickel
mglkg
216
12.1
24.9
33.2
251
16.2
3.78
7.19
22|
[Nickel
7440020]
48.60
Selenium
mg/kg
:
0.66
1.01
0.72
Selenium
7782492
1.80
Zine
mgikg
157
77.1
162
230
161
93.6
324
36.2
125
j2inc
74406668]
469.00
PNAs
-
Not Detected (<300 ug/kg)
BOD
-
Not Detected (<3 mg/i)Page 24
je ot AAI # Vi