Full record / Respondent's Answer and Affirmative Defenses.pdf

Respondent's Answer and Affirmative Defenses.pdf

Ggvr Investments LLC Petitioner Vs. City Of Troy Respondent · 26-001366-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

GGVR INVESTMENTS, LLC, 

Petitioner, 

MTT Docket: 26-001366 

Parcel ID 88-20-10-477-026 

CITY OF TROY, 

Respondent. 

/ 

JAY A. SCHWARTZ 

LORI GRIGG BLUHM (P46908) 

Property Tax Reduction Services, LLC. 

~~ JULIE QUINLAN DUFRANE (P59000) 

Petitioner's Representative 

TROY CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 

37887 West Twelve Mile Road 

Attorneys for Respondent 

Suite B 

500 W. Big Beaver Road 

Farmington Hills, MI 48331 

Troy, MI 48084 

(248) 672-1922 

(248) 524-3320 

JSchwartz@Property Tax 

BLUHMLG@TROYMI.gov 

ReductionServices.org 

/ 

RESPONDENT'S ANSWER TO PETITION AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 

NOW COMES, Respondent, CITY OF TROY, by and through its attorney, Lori Grigg 

Bluhm, and for its Answer to Petitioner's Petition, states as follows: 

1. 

2. 

As to Paragraph 1, Respondent admits the allegation. 

As to Paragraph 2, Respondent admits the allegation. 

As to Paragraph 3, no answer is required. 

As to Paragraph 4, no answer is required.

Page 2

7. 

As to Paragraph 7, Respondent admits that there was no board of review protest 

filed. 

8. 

As to Paragraph 8, no answer is required. 

9. 

As to Paragraph 9, no answer is required. 

10. 

As to Paragraph 10, Respondent admits the allegation. 

11. 

As to Paragraph 11, Respondent admits the allegation. 

12. 

As to Paragraph 12, Respondent admits the allegation. 

13. 

As to Paragraph 13, Respondent denies that there are any issues concerning the 

valuation, assessment, taxable value, and/or uniformity. 

14. 

As to paragraph 14, Respondent admits the allegation. 

15. 

As to Paragraph 15, no answer is required. 

16. 

As to Paragraph 16, Respondent admits the allegation. 

17. 

As to Paragraph 17, Respondent denies that the Petitioner's alleged values for the 

subject parcel is correct or supported by any basis. 

18. 

As to Paragraph 18, Respondent admits that Petitioner has correctly calculated 

the difference between Petitioner's claimed values for the subject property and the 

Respondent's value determinations. Respondent denies that the Petitioner's values are correct. 

19. 

As to Paragraph 19, Respondent denies that Petitioner is entitled to its requested 

relief. 

20. 

As to Paragraph 20, Respondent denies the allegation for the reason that it is

Page 3

Dated: September 17, 2026 

TROY 

Regal 

LORI GRIGG BLUHM (P46908) 

Attorney for Respondent 

500 W. Big Beaver Road 

Troy, MI 48084 

(248) 524-3320 

BluhmLG@troymi.gov 

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 

For its further Answer to Petitioners’ Petition, Respondent relies on the following 

Affirmative Defenses: 

1. 

Petitioners fail to allege specific and sufficient facts to set forth a cause of action 

against Respondent and to support its claim for relief. 

Petitioners fail to allege specific and sufficient facts to establish fraud, error of law, 

discrimination, application of wrong principles or illegality on the part of the 

Respondent or its agents. 

Petitioners fail to allege specific and sufficient facts to establish the true cash value, 

assessed value, and taxable value of its property. 

Petitioners fail to allege specific and sufficient facts to support its allegations that the 

property's taxable value is improper, or failed to conform with the mode and method 

applied in the case of all properties in the City of Troy for 2026. 

Any decrease in the value of Petitioner's property was a result of its own intentional

Page 4

6. 

Respondent has properly and lawfully assessed Petitioner's property and established 

its assessed and taxable value in accordance with statutory and constitutional 

requirements. 

7. 

Respondent reserves the right to argue additional Affirmative Defenses during the 

pendency of this action. 

WHEREFORE, Respondent, CITY OF TROY denies that Petitioner is entitled to its 

requested relief, and requests that the subject property’s assessment and taxable value be 

affirmed or increased, that Petitioners’ Petition be dismissed with prejudice, and that 

Respondent be granted costs and attorney fees so wrongfully sustained. 

Dated: September 17, 2026 

CITY OF TROY 

Reel 

LORI GRIGG BLUHM (P46908) 

Attorneys for Respondent 

500 W. Big Beaver Road 

Troy, MI 48084 

(248) 524-3320 

BluhmLG@troymi.gov

Page 5

Certificate of Service 

| hereby certify that on September 17, 2026, 

| served a copy of this 

Answer and Affirmative Defenses via email to Petitioner's representative Jay A. 

Schwartz at JSchwartz@propertytaxreductionservices.org and the following via 

first class mail: 

Chief Clerk, Michigan Tax Tribunal; P.O. Box 30232, Lansing, Ml 

48909; Michigan Department of Treasury, State Treasurer, 430 W. Allegan, 

Lansing, MI 49822; Secretary of School Board, Troy Public Schools, 4400 

Livernois Road, Troy, MI 48098; Director of Equalization; Oakland Pointe Office 

Building, 250 Elizabeth Lake Road Suite 1000; Pontiac, MI 48341; and Clerk, 

Oakland County; 1200 N. Telegraph, Building 12 East, Pontiac, MI 48341. 

Dated: September 17, 2026 

CITY OF TROY 

Clara Reid 

N 

Legal Administrative Coordinator 

500 W. Big Beaver Road 

Troy, MI 48084 

(248) 524-3320

PDF reading copy

← View full record