25-003117.pdf

Hassan Mahmoud, Petitioner V City Of Dearborn, Respondent · 25-003117-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

RECEIVED 

DEC 1 0 2025 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON |. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

aksewn 

 Malwoxd 

, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner(s) 

v 

MTT Docket No._%~ 0081 

City 

ob Deon 

9" 

Respondent(s) 

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 

1. 

| wish this Tribunal to reconsider 

Poser vy dex Gpea 

peyton 

fom 

- 

2. 

Good cause exists to grant reconsideration because: 

~ Did OF YEN 

fhe eNilS 

YEUeRIny docmentd 

0s uel) OF Die OAR) 

The C0IS were 

Yo spam 

folder, 

3. 

[ask this Tribunal to grant my request for reconsideration. 

Hasson Manmosd 

Party/Representative (sign here) 

PERG TAS 

[Print/&ype narhe of person signing} 

[ certify that on this date 

| served a copy of this Motion, and any additional documentation, on the 

opposing party or their representative. 

ol 03) 35 

Pr.

& 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

GRETCHEN WHITMER 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MARLON I. BROWN, DPA 

GOVERNOR 

LANSING 

DIRECTOR 

Hassan Mahmoud, 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

Petitioner, 

i 

SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION 

v 

MTT Docket No. 25-003117 

City of Dearborn, 

Presiding Judge 

Respondent. 

Patricia L. Halm 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The Tribunal has considered the file in this case and finds that Petitioner was placed in 

default on October 7, 2025, because Petitioner failed to include a copy of the notice 

giving rise to the appeal, i.e., poverty exemption denial notice. On November 8, 2025, 

the Tribunal extended the time for Petitioner to cure the default by an additional 14 

days, and they have failed to respond. Petitioner has not complied with either order, 

and the latter stated that “failure to comply with this Order may result in the dismissal of 

the case 

. 

. 

.” and referenced Grimm v Dep't of Treasury." 

In Grimm, the Michigan 

Court of Appeals summarized factors that the Tribunal should consider before imposing 

the sanction of dismissal. Those factors are: 

(1) whether the violation was wilful or accidental; (2) the party's history of 

refusing to comply with previous court orders; 

(3) the prejudice 

to the 

opposing party; (4) whether there exists a history of deliberate delay; (5) the 

degree of compliance with other parts of the court's orders; (6) attempts to 

cure the defect; and (7) whether a lesser sanction would better serve the 

interests of justice. 

Here, Petitioner's failure to comply with multiple orders has established a history of 

deliberate delay. As a result, giving careful consideration to the factors involved and 

considering all options in determining what sanction is just and proper, the Tribunal 

finds that dismissal is appropriate, and a lesser sanction would not be appropriate in 

light of Petitioner's history of noncompliance in this case. 

Therefore, 

IT 1S ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED.

MTT Docket No. 25-003117 

Page 2 of 2 

APPEAL RIGHTS 

If you disagree with the final decision in this case, you may file a motion for 

reconsideration with the Tribunal or a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of 

Appeals. 

A motion for reconsideration must be filed with the Tribunal with the required filing fee 

within 21 days from the date of entry of the final decision. Because the final decision 

closes the case, the motion cannot be filed through the Tribunal's web-based e-filing 

system; it must be filed by mail or personal service. The fee for the filing of such 

motions is $50.00 in the Entire Tribunal and $25.00 in the Small Claims Division, unless 

the Small Claims decision relates to the valuation of property and the property had a 

principal residence exemption of at least 50% at the time the petition was filed or the 

decision relates to the grant or denial of a poverty or disabled veterans exemption and, 

if so, there is no filing fee. You are required to serve a copy of the motion on the 

opposing party by mail or personal service or by email if the opposing party agrees to 

electronic service, and proof demonstrating that service must be submitted with the 

motion. Responses to motions for reconsideration are prohibited and there are no oral 

arguments unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal. 

Alternatively, you may file a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals. 

If the 

claim is filed within 21 days of the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal of right.” 

If 

the claim is filed more than 21 days after the entry of the final decision, it is an “appeal 

by leave.” A copy of the claim of appeal must be filed with the Tribunal to certify the 

record on appeal. There is no certification fee. 

Entered: December 3, 2025 

By 

_aliicos 

oo ita 

kac 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

| certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent on the entry date indicated above to the 

parties or their attorneys or authorized representatives, 

if any, utilizing either the mailing 

or email addresses on file, as provided by those parties, attorneys, or authorized 

representatives. 

By: Tribunal Clerk

015 

JULY BOARD OF REVIEW 

Change Notice 

Jub 22,2025 

H 

| 

Re: 

duly Board of Review Change Notice 

8110 083 15023 

5819 CALHOUN 

Dear Property Owner: 

On Jul 22,2025 

the July Board of Review made the following correction to the assessed, capped and 

taxable values or to the Principal Residence Exemption for the above referenced parcel. 

Original 

Corrected 

Year 

Assessed 

Capped 

Taxable 

Year 

Assessed 

Capped 

Taxable 

202% 

61.200 

36,513 

36,513 

2025 

61,200 

36,513 

36,513 

Principal Residence Exemption: 0.0000 

Principal Residence Exemption: 0.0000 

DENIED 

MCL 211.74 - Poverty 

Adjustment Type: 

xemption 

The action of the July Board of Review may be appealed to the Michigan Tax Tribunal within 35 days after 

the final decision, ruling or deternination. To appeal to the Michigan Tux Tribunal, file a petition with the 

MTT that can be obtained from their website: 

1 Jlwww.amichigan.gov/taxtrib 

7] 

you have any guestic 

arding the above changes, please do vot hesitate to contact us at (313) 943-2140 

Sincerely 

DEARBORN 

Board of Review

DEARBORN, MI 4812

$0.78 

RDC 99 

$2324M502122-88 

= 

| 

nn Hasan Moho: 

a 

FF 11 

(of ewer Devos i 

n 

MT U3 

( 

Wi chigen To bv buna 

Gl. GTTRWA 

ST 

[Rees 

Lansing 

ME C3135 

ong 

\: 

pec 

09 20 

£0 ON 3dLHL Lonny 

a 

Boum 

EEE GTO i 

dd 

bgp 

Db 

deg [gf 

eye 

Pegg bg fo

← View full record