Full record / Answer to Petition and Affirmative Defenses and PoS - 7-16-26 (1).pdf

Answer to Petition and Affirmative Defenses and PoS - 7-16-26 (1).pdf

Stellar Hospitality Muskegon LLC Petitioner Vs. Township Of Fruitport Respondent · 26-000561-TT

← View full record

Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.

Page 1

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STELLAR HOSPITALITY MUSKEGON, LLC, 

MTT Docket No. 26-000561 

Petitioner, 

Parcel No. 15-426-000-0001-00, 

Vs. 

and additional parcels 

FRUITPORT CHARTER TOWNSHIP, 

ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE 

DEFENSES TO PETITION 

Respondent. 

/ 

Laura M. Hallahan (P42101) 

Bradley J. Fisher (P64608) 

HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 

SCHOLTEN FANT 

Attorney for Petitioner 

Attorneys for Respondent 

1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 

100 North Third Street, P. O. Box 454 

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 

Grand Haven, MI 49417-0454 

(258) 731-3089 

(616) 842-3030 

lhallahan@hallahanlaw.com 

bfisher@scholtenfant.com 

RESPONDENT’S ANSWER TO PETITION 

NOW COMES Respondent, FRUITPORT CHARTER TOWNSHIP, by and through 

its attorneys, Scholten Fant, and responds to Petitioner’s Property Tax Petition as follows: 

1. 

Admitted upon information and belief. 

2. 

N/a. 

3. 

Admitted upon information and belief. 

4. 

Admitted upon information and belief. 

S. 

Admitted upon information and belief. 

6. 

Neither admitted 

nor denied 

as Respondent 

lacks 

sufficient knowledge 

or 

information as to form a belief and therefore leaves the Petitioner to its proofs. 

7. 

Admitted upon information and belief. 

8. 

Admitted upon information and belief. 

9. 

Neither admitted nor denied, the referenced exhibit speaks for itself. 

a. Admitted upon information and belief. 

1

Page 2

b. Neither admitted nor denied 

as Respondent 

lacks sufficient knowledge 

or 

information as to form a belief and therefore leaves the Petitioner to its proofs. 

c. 

Neither admitted nor denied as Respondent lacks sufficient knowledge 

or 

information as to form a belief and therefore leaves the Petitioner to its proofs. 

10. 

Denied as untrue. 

a. 

Denied as untrue. 

b. 

Denied as untrue. 

c. 

Denied as untrue. 

d. 

Denied as untrue. 

WHEREFORE, Respondent respectfully requests that the Tribunal deny Petitioner 

its 

requested relief, affirm Respondent’s assessment of the subject property, award Respondent its 

costs and attorney’s fees in defending this action and any other relief that the Tribunal determines 

is fair, just and equitable. 

Dated: July 16, 2026 

Bradley J. Fisher 

(Ra4608) 

Attorneys for Respondent, Fruitport Charter Twp.

Page 3

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PETITION 

NOW COMES the Respondent, FRUITPORT CHARTER TOWNSHIP, by and through 

its attorneys, Scholten Fant, and states that it may rely on one or all of the following affirmative 

defenses: 

1. 

The appropriate methods of assessing the Subject Property were used and that 

method conforms to the methods used to assess similarly situated property in the State. 

2. 

Petitioner has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 

8. 

Petitioner may not be a proper party-in-interest. 

4. 

Petitioner may not have standing to appeal. 

5% 

The Tribunal may lack subject matter jurisdiction over this appeal. 

6. 

Petitioner may have failed to comply with state property tax law by, inter alia, failing 

to report or failing to report completely its assessable property such that its property taxes were 

delinquent or underpaid, such that Petitioner is precluded from appealing its property values, and 

such that Respondent should be awarded damages. 

7. 

Respondent reserves the right to add additional affirmative defenses as they become 

known to it through discovery in this matter. 

WHEREFORE, Respondent requests that the Tribunal affirm the assessed and taxable 

values as determined by Respondent, dismiss the Petition, and award Respondent costs, attorney 

fees and any other relief that the Tribunal determines is fair, just and equitable. 

Dated: July 16.2026 

Bradley J. Fisher (P64608) 

Attorneys for Respondent, Fruitport Charter Twp. 

w

Page 4

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS 

MICHIGAN OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES 

MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL 

STELLAR HOSPITALITY MUSKEGON, LLC, 

MTT Docket No. 26-000561 

Petitioner, 

Parcel No. 15-426-000-0001-00, 

VS. 

and additional parcels 

FRUITPORT CHARTER TOWNSHIP, 

Respondent. 

/ 

Laura M. Hallahan (P42101) 

Bradley J. Fisher (P64608) 

HALLAHAN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 

SCHOLTEN FANT 

Attorney for Petitioner 

Attorneys for Respondent 

1750 S. Telegraph Road, Suite 202 

100 North Third Street, P. O. Box 454 

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 

Grand Haven, MI 49417-0454 

(258) 731-3089 

(616) 842-3030 

lhallahan@hallahanlaw.com 

bfisher@scholtenfant.com 

/ 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing document was e-filed with the Michigan Tax 

Tribunal and served upon all parties and/or attorneys of record to this action to their addresses as 

disclosed by the pleadings, on July 

16, 2026, via U.S. Mail 

First Class, from Grand Haven, 

Michigan, with postage thereon fully prepaid. 

Dated: July 16, 2026 

Legal Assistant to Bradley J. Fisher

PDF reading copy

← View full record