MTT submission for docket No 24-003393.pdf
John Hanley, Petitioner V Township Of Leelanau, Respondent · 24-003393-TT
Text extracted from the reviewed PDF, organized by page. OCR and reading order may contain errors; confirm details in the PDF below.
Page 1
The Michigan constitution requires property to be uniformly assessed at 50% of the usual selling price, also referred to as true cash value. As depicted in the market comparison, it does not appear there is a uniform application of assessing property of homes located near our home (parcel # 042-150-001-01). Given the assessment of our home of $678,400, the true cash value would be $1,356,800. There is no comparison of substantiating that price in our immediate location of the Village of Northport. The most recent sale of a home (parcel# 042-400-008-00) in 2024 was $950,000 for a stated five-bedroom home and also located on the water. Our home has three bedrooms. Further, our immediate neighbor (parcel # 042- 150-003-01) is assessed only 0.69% higher while their taxable value is lower by $111,413 or 26.25%. Their home is much larger and twice the size of our home. In preparing the market comparison extracted from the Leelanau County property search function on their website, one feature that is consistent is newer construction homes are assessed and have a taxable value significantly higher than existing homes, except for one newer construction home. I brought this to the attention of the Board of Review (“Board”) in the appeals hearing. The answer from the chairperson was surprising. He explained to me that since my house was new construction with finishes that would be considerably higher than existing homes. Further, he stated that homes in the market comparison I provided to the Board have depreciated over time and therefore are assessed at a lower value. My answer to him was that they are highly likely to not know the finishes inside every home and they can be similar to mine from renovations that have occurred. In addition, I expressed to the Board that by using the Chairperson’s logic of depreciation, my home will depreciate over time and therefore my Assessed Value and Taxable Value will come down. That certainly will never be the case. On the Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation and Property Classification submitted to us for 2024, the assessor’s reason for the changes in values was market adjustment. If that is the case, what is the justification for the market adjustment? There does not seem to be one to me when looking at the market comparison. There clearly is no uniform application used by the assessor, nor has one been explained to me. This pattern is unfortunately continuing for 2025 where the Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation and Property Classification increased the Assessed Value by 36.14% to $923,600 ($1,847,200 True Cash Value) and the Taxable Value by 3.09% to $552,533. There was no reason stated on the form. In two years (2024 and 2025) our Assessed Valuation has gone up by 80.96% and the Taxable Value has increased by 8.26%.
Page 2
Market Comparison Notes Address Parcel Number Current Year (2025) Last Year (2024) % Change Prior Year (2023) % Change Current Year (2025) Last Year (2024) % Change Prior Year (2023) % Change Current Year (2025) Last Year (2024) % Change Prior Year (2023) % Change 2025 2024 construction finalized and occupancy of the home in Nov 2022 226 E 5th St 042-150-001-01 552,533 535,920 3.10% 510,400 5.00% 923,600 678,400 36.14% 510,400 32.92% 923,600 678,400 36.14% 510,400 32.92% 60% 79% immediate neighbor to the south and house is twice our sq ft; newer construction 227 E 4th St 042-150-003-01 424,507 392,137 8.25% 683,100 532,100 28.38% 683,100 532,100 28.38% 62% 214 E 4th St 042-150-004-00 231,690 214,023 8.25% 441,800 334,400 32.12% 441,800 334,400 32.12% 52% newer construction; neighbor adjacent to my home on the west 10149 N Shore Dr 042-350-187-10 240,786 229,320 5.00% 258,800 236,400 9.48% 258,800 236,400 9.48% 93% immediate neighbor to the north 10152 N Shore Dr 042-400-001-00 334,102 318,193 5.00% 512,500 425,600 20.42% 512,500 425,600 20.42% 65% 10160 N Shore Dr 042-400-004-00 269,897 257,045 5.00% 450,900 373,900 20.59% 450,900 373,900 20.59% 60% 10178 N Shore Dr 042-400-006-00 189,278 180,265 5.00% 293,700 247,700 18.57% 293,700 247,700 18.57% 64% sold in May 2025 for $950,000; listed as a five bedroom home 10198 N Shore Dr 042-400-008-00 272,100 174,217 56.18% 272,100 234,200 16.18% 272,100 234,200 16.18% 100% newer construction; has two parcels 10414 N Shore Dr 042-400-009-00 708,750 675,750 4.88% 908,400 675,000 34.58% 908,400 675,000 34.58% 78% 10446 N Shore Dr 042-400-011-00 241,242 229,755 5.00% 383,100 333,900 14.73% 383,100 333,900 14.73% 63% 10462 N Shore Dr 042-400-013-00 360,465 343,300 5.00% 423,100 343,300 23.24% 423,100 343,300 23.24% 85% 10482 N Shore Dr 042-400-015-00 252,042 240,040 5.00% 340,900 289,700 17.67% 340,900 289,700 17.67% 74% 10510 N Shore Dr 042-400-017-00 510,312 486,012 5.00% 690,600 555,600 24.30% 690,600 555,600 24.30% 74% 10540 N Shore Dr 042-400-022-00 209,325 199,358 5.00% 258,500 232,300 11.28% 258,500 232,300 11.28% 81% 10554 N Shore Dr 042-400-023-00 138,139 131,561 5.00% 222,000 193,000 15.03% 222,000 193,000 15.03% 62% major renovation that more than doubled the space of the house in 2024 10578 N Shore Dr 042-400-025-00 470,112 132,107 255.86% 559,600 216,200 158.83% 559,600 216,200 158.83% 84% 10596 N Shore Dr 042-400-027-00 109,216 104,016 5.00% 182,900 173,300 5.54% 182,900 173,300 5.54% 60% 10604 N Shore Dr 042-400-028-00 199,598 190,094 5.00% 324,600 279,200 16.26% 324,600 279,200 16.26% 61% data extracted from Leelanau County property search (https://www.leelanau.gov/how_do_i/property_search.php) on March 26, 2005 Taxable Value as % or Assessment/SEV Taxable Value Assessment S.E.V.
Page 3
er Area
Petition to Board of
i
res Yorn
Based Linde Be
Review
L-4035
authority
of PA. 700
of 1893, 55 amend:
Fi
re
1
E
higan
]
.
.
x
L
a i wins, howd you mary ct appeal 5 tha Wi
Ton Tribal
Stata Tax Comeritsion
unless you Br protest 10 he Boar
of Review
rd
=
© BE COMPLETED BY OWNER OR OWHER'S AGENT
Se
Fri
of
Tyga
PRStonar § Nam (1 Cr Dut Chwrad. FRASS
Prt oF Type]
HANLEY JOHN P
Timea: or Cay
=
rT
=
Ere
LEELANAL
Thea wrbarybgreees proasnty thi STEERS wa
oel'sr thi bankas Eacabie vik
andlor tha (easy cliaumoathn andi
Te Susifed sgrivuliunl propery sosmgi
of
Tha Polarwimg Seacriced property
Frogs
Free] [Fare coos reared Poesy SEess A mga dericion splaeall
TR
——
—
042-150-001-01
|
PAT OF LOT
1 ASSESSORS PLAT 2 VILLAGE OF ROSITHPORT COM
NW COR S00LOT
|
THE
B# DEG
01 £167.40
FT TO POR TH 8 89 DEG 01" E 151.44
FT TO RORATHPORT BAY |
TH & Of DEG 27
'W 37,75 FT TH 500 DEG &ir WW 31 47 FT TH $13 DEG
30
€ HE
FT THS)
48 DEC XP E 5.79
FT TH K 80 DEG
04 I 157.83 FT TH M00 DEG 18
WW 100.28
FT TO FOES
226 E FIFTH 5T
Protested Hem
Wl assossed Valeo
[B Tontative Taxable Value
[1 Classification
0 usted Agricultural
Praparty Exemplion
1.
PROTEST OF ASSESSMENT
|Comyiets
I soction
for a protenl
of assessed vim andor tentative tat
vaka)
maT
i
2.
PROTEST OF CLASSIFICATION
[Carmine fa mebtion lor # expssl Bs Gangs: foe claasiicaion. Tr Bed of Faveew must make Iai Sein regarding clav-Scaton In Socorro
itn ctor 31 ac of eb Lrg
Coombe Lise, Tres Fest of ure shel cd [ohare ty ra
bec Fd 8 fricuiar classic
hs on
ht property's +950 23 0 Forme
3 (yp
reicance or gual Bagh
pooparts
|
4
(atmare
Tom Sanh Veh
iain
Tasatia Vai
-
|
535,920
2024
[a
rope
on
Fi
pear asaared fd
402
73
Canali Bhd ba rs ol rn Bole)
[0 Agricultural
i
[1 Industrial.
Cimimber Guiever
[1] Usisy {Personal Propesty Oni)
[J commercial
[J Residential
CO pevelopmental
|
3 PROTEST
OF EXEMPTION FOR QUALIFIED AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY
Fm mani hs Serine or changes
a paractage of fe susp
rom a 18 mi of ical sche
ied
appeal
AS HED re To AREER CANCT UPON
i dion 0 Er bases Bho
of Brie. THE ICME) OF REVIEW
F
c
cH
ithwiabing 4m THE $8 SCHOGE CETRATING MILLE FOI ROUECWRIRTS PRINCI, RESIDENCE FROFERTIER}
Crema
Erie
od Al
| [Feria moi
ware
ied by sph
(LU
ATO
S47)
’
RR
Et
4. REASON
FOR PROTEST
|
Star
dn) or proimal of paseasad valve pd Te Sones Hh
VEL BRAT CANCE
prior Gusiis] grou Srsl DIIpATY Basmpion.
|
SEE ATTALHED PoINT
CERTIFICARDN
[i
“SU
ct
T3lize
on. I
Tal 233-8374
wes cig
GE TERYPage 4
regan
o Tremsy.
1218 (Ra, 11-23)
THIS IS NOT A TAX BILL
Maotice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification
Dd
rabat ed Th ay of PA Tab of BEY Sha 341 Tho) wed
nt 71] Soke,
dm mami
Th
i
a reried mired
L-td00
im ba A
ey To
pens
LEELAMAL TOWNSHIP
ATTH: ASSESSING DEPT
FO BOX 334
HORTHPORT, MI 48870-0338
PARCEL IDENTIFICATION
45-042-150-001-04
PARCEL HUMBER
PROPERTY ADDRESS
226 E FIFTH ST
NORTHPORT, MI 43670
fd
T
I
z
m8
PL
g
SELTTT
[i
—
TRVSIERTS FAME, & ADDRELLPERSCH
MAMED On ASSESSMENT RIAL
SRMGIAAL RESIENCE EXEMPTION
*, Expl
Ax Hosmsowran Principal Reside
100.004
HANLEY JOHN P & PAIGE L
% Exempt As “OusiSted Agricuftoral
Propedty
20%
226 E FIFTH 5T
a Frorged
Aa "MOT industrial Personal™
00%
MORTHPORT, MI 45670
% Fang
Aa "MIT Commanial Personal™
oa
Exnergt ha “CsnBlod Forest Propeety™ [] as
[| Mo
ClYes
[FE Ho
|
Exergsd An Trpvaloprmant Property”.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
PRT OF LOT
1 ASSES!
TH 5 B3 DEG 01° E 153,
SORE PLAT 2 VILLAGE OF HORTHPORT
COM PFW CORSD LOT TH § 89 DEG OF E 167.49 FT.TO POS
FTTH
S 00 DEG 45 WH
ATFTTHS 13 DEG 3
“4 FT TO NORTHPORT BAY TH 5 08 DEG 27 W 37.75
ACCORDING TO MCL 211.34c THIS PROPERTY 15 CLASSIFIED AS:
402 (RESIDENTIAL-VAGANT)
PRIGR YEAR'S CLASSIFICATION:
402 [RESIDENTIAL-VACANT]
CLRAENT TEMEATRE
BUsGEEROY
MOUNT
YEAR:
2ead
CURRENT YEAR
1. TAXABLE VALVE:
==
7.
ASSESSED VALUE:
=. TENTATIVE EQUALIZATION FACTOR:
4. STATE EQUALIZED VALUE [SEVE
E, Them Wins or WAS N OT a barat:
of swnership oo thy proparty In 023
WAS NOT
5. Assessor Change Reasonis):
Marke! Adjustment, Market Adjustment
1
The 2024 Inflatian
rata bubsiplier 3: 10
:
+
Ouestians regandng
the botics
of Aszassment, Taxable Vakia tan, anc Fropary Classification
may ba drocted ka the Follett:
[Flame
CHRISTY M BROW, MAAD
Errad hadmit
AESESSORELEDLANALTCWNSHIPML GOV
March Board of Review Appeal Information:
GRDAY, MARCH 11 TH FROM
BOARD OF REVIEW WILL BE HELD AT THI
3:00 PM TO 4:00 Phi & 5:90 PM T0 8:00 PM ANG TU
APPEALS MUST BE REGENED IN WRITING, AT TH
MUST INCLUDE THE COMPLETED
G18{L=
DOCUMENTS,
DO NOT SUBMIT O
HOF: TO THE ASSESSOR.
E TOWNSHI
J AFP
5, THEY
5
| OFFICES, HEARINGS WILL BE HELD M
ESDAY, MARCH 12 THF
E TOWMEHIP OFFICES, NO LATER THAN
EAL FORM IH ORDER TOBE
WILL NOT BE RETURNED. NO
FIC B00 AR TE ROO
io
MARCH 12 TH BY 4PM APPEAL
APPEALS
ARE TO BE 5
& 1:00 Pr TO E:00 PHL ALL
WITH ANY SUPPORT
UBMITTED WIAERMAILPage 5
WR [a
sls
1h
Ia
IND
MA
AMAA
DILL
L-4400
Notice of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Property Classification
Tim
ms
dd Ut
Pa maori
of PA S08
of 1840
ile Bae 1H Set
i demerit
Th
8 eid STE
i UB ot]
ye
om ania
FRA
sds
LEELAMAL TOWNSHIP
~BARCEL
IDENTIFICATION
ATTN: ASSESSING DEFT
PARCEL HUMES:
042-150-6010
PO BOX 338
MORTHPORT, MI 48670-0338
PROPERTY ADDRESS
226 E FIFTH ST
NORTHPORT, MI 49870
PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE EXEMPTION
ERED HALE D ON ASSESSMENT RCL:
TERT
HAME & ADDREAL
% Exam
Ad "Homsownars
Principal Fsslds
100.00%
HAMLEY JOHM P & PAIGE L
% Exam
As “Oualifact Agricuttural Property
B0%
EE FIFTH ST
% Exempt
As "MET Industrial Pamscna™
00%
NORTHPORT, MI 45670
% Exsmot A8 "MET Conrenarial Prareonal™
0%
Emp
As “Ousified Forest Property.
[| wes
[H] No
Freer
Aa "Development Property”
[Yar
[X] Ha
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PRT OF LOT 1 ASSESSORS PLAT
2 VILLAGE OF NORTHPORT COM NW COR SD LOT TH 8 88 DEG
01' E 167.49 FT TO FOB
TH 5 83 DEG 01° E 153.44 FT TO NORTHPORT BAY TH 2 08 DEG 27 W 37.76
FT TH 8 00 DEG 46 W 31.47 FT TH 8 13 DEG 30
ACCORDING TO MCL 211 34c THIS PRGPERTY 15 CLASSIFIED AS: 401
Residential
PRIOR YEAR'S CLASSIFICATION:
402
Beaidenkial
FRA AMOUNT
CLARLHT TENTATIVE
Efe Ld
1
FRESHER
TD
TN
VEAL
eng
ALCL IER
ae
CLARENT TAR
1. TAXABLE VALLE:
i
i
852.55 Calle
15513
2, ASSESSED VALUE:
&78.400
2d
3. TENTATIVE EQUALIZATION FACTOR:
1.000
£. STATE EQUALIZED VALUE (SEV)
78.400
923,600
245,200
&. There VAS
or WAS NOT a transfer of ownership
on this property
in 2024
WAS NOT
6. Assessor Change Reason|s):
Tha 2025 Inflatien rate Multiplier
ks: 1.001
-
Cransans regarding
the Notice
of Assessment, Taxable Valuation, and Prapacty Chilo may bo directed
ba the Following;
Haas:
Frama
Erma Addrean:
CHRISTY
M BROW, MAAD
31355-5138
ASSESSORELEELANALTOWNEHIPMLGOY
[March Haard of Haview Appeal information:
i
BOARD
OF REVIEW WILL BE HELD, AT THE TOWNSHIP OFFICES, HEARINGS WILL BE HELD MONDAY, MARCH 10 TH FROM
4:00 PM TO 4:00 PM & 6:00 PM TO 8:00 PM, TUESDAY, MARCH 11 TH FROM #:00 Fi TO 4:00 PM, WEDNESDAY, MARCH 12TH
FROM 1:00 PM TO 4:00 PM, THURSDAY, MARCH 13TH FROM 9:00
AM TO ROOM. ALL APPEALS MUST
BE RECEIVED IN
WRITING,
AT THE TOWNSHIP OFFICES, NO LATER THAN BY THE CLOSE OF THE FINAL HEARING. AFFEALS MUST INCLUDE
THE COMPLETED 615({L~£035) APPEAL FORM
IN ORDER TO BE HEARD ALONG
WITH ANY SUPPORT DOCUMENTS, DO NOT
SUBMIT ORIGINALS, THEY WILL HOT BE RETURNED. NO ARP!
ALS
ARE TO BE SUBMITTED
VIA EMAIL NOR TO THE
ASSESSOR.
Tr
Ww
140